Oppo Reno7 SE 5G vs Oppo A78: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 SE 5G offers a more powerful chipset for smoother performance, while the A78 boasts faster charging and potentially a slightly better display. Ultimately, the Reno7 SE 5G is the better choice for performance-focused users, while the A78 is ideal for those prioritizing charging speed and potentially a more vibrant screen.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 SE 5G | Oppo A78 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | IP54 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | PFCM00 | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
Oppo Reno7 SE 5G
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 900)
- 5G Connectivity
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less vibrant display
Oppo A78
- Faster charging (33W PD)
- Potentially better display
- More affordable
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 700)
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely AMOLED or IPS LCD) with a resolution around FHD+. The A78's specifications suggest it may have slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to its PD charging support often correlating with higher quality panels. However, without specific display specs, it's difficult to definitively say which is superior.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely offer a versatile camera system with multiple lenses (main, ultrawide, macro), the Reno7 SE 5G's more powerful processor could allow for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Specific camera specs (megapixel count, aperture) would be needed for a more accurate comparison.
Performance
The Reno7 SE 5G's Dimensity 900 chipset is significantly more powerful than the A78's Dimensity 700. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Dimensity 900's Cortex-A78 cores offer a noticeable performance boost over the A78's Cortex-A76 cores.
Battery Life
The A78 has a clear advantage in charging speed with its 33W wired charging and PD support, claiming 52% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 67 minutes. The Reno7 SE 5G's 33W charging is slower, and the 5W reverse wired charging is a minor bonus but not a primary factor.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 SE 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance and gaming. It's a good choice for those who want a 5G-capable phone without breaking the bank. The Oppo A78 is a great option for users who value fast charging, a potentially better display, and a more budget-friendly price point. It's suitable for everyday tasks and media consumption.