Oppo Reno7 SE 5G vs Nothing Phone (1): A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nothing Phone (1) emerges as the stronger choice. While both phones offer 33W charging, the Snapdragon 778G+ chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, coupled with the added convenience of 15W wireless charging and a superior endurance rating of 108 hours. The Reno7 SE remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing a simpler Android experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 SE 5G | Nothing Phone (1) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2022, July 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, live HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh (17.42 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | White, Black |
| Models | PFCM00 | A063 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 539.00 / £ 234.77 / € 249.95 / ₹ 17,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.29 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.48 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno7 SE 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Clean and streamlined ColorOS interface
- 33W fast wired charging
- Less powerful Dimensity 900 chipset
- No wireless charging support
- Limited battery endurance information
Nothing Phone (1)
- Faster Snapdragon 778G+ 5G processor
- 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Superior battery endurance (108h rating)
- Higher price tag
- Unique Glyph Interface may not appeal to everyone
- Nothing OS is a relatively new software experience
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (1) boasts a measured peak brightness of 663 nits, offering a visibly brighter experience in direct sunlight compared to the Reno7 SE, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Phone (1)'s higher peak brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. The Reno7 SE’s display specifications are less defined, making it difficult to assess color accuracy or potential for high refresh rates. The Phone (1)'s design also minimizes bezels, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of sensor specifics for both devices. However, the Nothing Phone (1) is marketed with a stronger emphasis on its dual 50MP camera system, suggesting a more robust photography experience. The Reno7 SE’s camera capabilities are less emphasized, implying a more standard mid-range offering. The Phone (1)'s image processing algorithms, coupled with potential OIS (Optical Image Stabilization – unconfirmed in context data, but likely), will likely deliver sharper, more detailed photos and smoother video recording. The Reno7 SE likely relies more heavily on software enhancements to compensate for potentially smaller sensors.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G in the Nothing Phone (1) represents a significant step up from the MediaTek Dimensity 900 in the Oppo Reno7 SE. The 778G+ features a 1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 core and 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the Reno7 SE’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This core configuration, combined with the 6nm fabrication process on both chips, gives the Snapdragon a clear advantage in multi-core performance and sustained workloads. The Phone (1) is better equipped for demanding games and multitasking. While both are 6nm, Qualcomm's Adreno GPU generally outperforms Mali GPUs found in Dimensity chips.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (1) claims an endurance rating of 108 hours, indicating superior battery life compared to the Reno7 SE, for which endurance data is unavailable. While both support 33W wired charging, the Phone (1) adds the convenience of 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Reno7 SE. The Phone (1) can reach 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 70 minutes, a faster and more versatile charging solution than the Reno7 SE’s 33W wired charging alone. The combination of efficient chipset and larger battery capacity gives the Phone (1) a clear advantage in longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G if you need a reliable, no-frills 5G experience and prioritize a clean, streamlined ColorOS interface. It's ideal for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Nothing Phone (1) if you prefer a more distinctive design, a faster processor for demanding apps and games, and the added flexibility of wireless charging. It’s geared towards users who appreciate a unique software experience and are willing to pay a premium for it.