Oppo Reno7 SE 5G vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and a vibrant display, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the Reno7 SE’s 33W, and the 1004 nits peak brightness provides superior outdoor visibility. However, the Reno7 SE offers a slightly more powerful CPU core configuration.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 SE 5G | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | PFCM00 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 SE 5G
- Potentially higher single-core CPU performance with Dimensity 900
- Reverse wired charging for accessory power
- Oppo's ColorOS offers extensive customization options
- Slower 33W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 30 Neo
- Limited details on camera sensor specifications
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- Brighter 1004 nits display for outdoor visibility
- Wireless charging support
- Snapdragon 695 CPU may throttle under sustained load
- Motorola's My UX is a more minimalist software experience
- Camera image processing may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno7 SE. This makes the Edge 30 Neo far more usable in direct sunlight. While both displays are likely OLED, the Edge 30 Neo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent black levels. The Reno7 SE’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and PWM dimming frequency unanswered, potentially impacting users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Reno7 SE’s camera system is likely tuned for Oppo’s signature vibrant color profile, while Motorola typically aims for a more natural look. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, potentially impacting low-light video quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
Both phones utilize 6nm process nodes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Oppo Reno7 SE’s MediaTek Dimensity 900 features a dual-cluster CPU with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 employs 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While clock speeds are comparable, the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 900 generally offer higher single-core performance. However, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and potentially better thermal management, preventing sustained throttling under heavy load. The Reno7 SE may initially feel faster, but the Edge 30 Neo could maintain performance longer during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G and Motorola Edge 30 Neo achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Reno7 SE’s 33W charging. The Edge 30 Neo also adds 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno7 SE. This charging speed advantage makes the Edge 30 Neo more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G if you need a phone that prioritizes sustained CPU performance for tasks like video editing or running multiple apps simultaneously, and aren't overly concerned with charging speed. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a phone with a brighter, more visible display, incredibly fast charging, and a generally smoother user experience for everyday tasks and light gaming.