Google Pixel 6a vs Oppo Reno7 SE 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a emerges as the stronger choice. Its Google Tensor chip offers a more sophisticated processing experience, particularly in AI-driven tasks like photography and voice recognition, and it benefits from Google’s long-term software support. While the Reno7 SE 5G boasts faster charging, the Pixel 6a’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 SE 5G | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | PFCM00 | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Oppo Reno7 SE 5G
- Superior camera performance thanks to Google’s image processing.
- More powerful and efficient Google Tensor chip.
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support.
- Slower charging speed (18W) compared to the Reno7 SE 5G.
- No expandable storage.
Google Pixel 6a
- Faster 33W wired charging for quick top-ups.
- Potentially lighter and more streamlined design.
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessories.
- Less powerful MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset.
- Less sophisticated camera system.
- Shorter software support lifecycle.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 876 nits, significantly outshining what’s typically found in this price bracket, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno7 SE 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, Oppo generally focuses on color accuracy in this series. The Pixel 6a’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, delivers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The lack of high refresh rate on either device is a notable omission, but the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and contrast give it an edge for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system benefits significantly from Google’s computational photography prowess, even without detailed sensor specifications. Google’s image processing algorithms excel at dynamic range, noise reduction, and detail preservation. The Reno7 SE 5G, while likely offering a capable camera, relies more on hardware specifications. Without knowing the sensor sizes, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but Google’s software optimization gives the Pixel 6a a distinct advantage in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno7 SE 5G suggests a less emphasized camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) utilizes a 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 and 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 configuration, designed for on-device machine learning. This contrasts with the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6nm) with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Tensor chip’s 5nm process generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the Dimensity 900’s 6nm node, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Tensor chip provides a noticeable advantage in AI-intensive applications and image processing.
Battery Life
Both the Pixel 6a and Reno7 SE 5G achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing approaches. The Reno7 SE 5G compensates for a potentially smaller battery capacity with its 33W wired charging, significantly faster than the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging. The Pixel 6a’s PD3.0 support offers some level of fast charging compatibility, but it won’t match the Reno7 SE 5G’s speed. Users prioritizing quick top-ups will favor the Reno7 SE 5G, while those who prefer longer intervals between charges will find both phones adequate.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a lighter, more streamlined user experience focused on core smartphone functions. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t heavily rely on advanced software features. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a superior camera system, a smoother and more intelligent software experience, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google. It’s the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those who want a phone that will stay up-to-date for years to come.