Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G vs vivo V27: A Clash of Mid-Range Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 edges out the Reno7 Pro 5G thanks to its brighter display, more modern chipset (Dimensity 7200), and impressive battery life. While the Reno7 Pro 5G boasts faster charging, the V27’s overall package provides a more refined and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| RGB notification lights around the camera island | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.0 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | ARM G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | PFDM00, CPH2293 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- Slightly more compact design
- Good AMOLED display
- Older chipset
- Lower battery life
- Less bright display
vivo V27
- Brighter Display (1055 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Dimensity 7200)
- Excellent Battery Life (134h endurance)
- Modern Design
- Slower charging (66W)
- Potentially larger size
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1055 nits, significantly brighter than the Reno7 Pro 5G. While the Reno7 Pro 5G has a good AMOLED display, the V27’s brightness makes it far more usable outdoors. The V27's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but the display is still excellent.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the vivo V27 appears to have a slight edge in image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The V27's camera software likely benefits from newer processing algorithms. Both phones offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
The vivo V27’s Dimensity 7200 (4nm) chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Reno7 Pro 5G’s Dimensity 1200 Max. The newer architecture and manufacturing process contribute to better efficiency and smoother multitasking. While the Reno7 Pro 5G’s CPU is clocked slightly higher, the Dimensity 7200’s overall architecture is more modern.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 134 hours – a significant advantage over the Reno7 Pro 5G. While the Reno7 Pro 5G’s 65W charging is faster, the V27’s larger battery capacity and efficient chipset mean it will last much longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more compact design. The vivo V27 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, efficient performance, and extended battery life, especially if photography is a key consideration.