Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G vs Oppo Reno8: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 edges out the Reno7 Pro 5G thanks to its faster charging, slightly more efficient chipset, and improved display brightness. While the Reno7 Pro 5G boasts a powerful Dimensity 1200 Max, the Reno8’s overall package provides a more compelling value proposition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G | Oppo Reno8 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| RGB notification lights around the camera island | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.0 GHz | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | ARM G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | PFDM00, CPH2293 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Powerful Dimensity 1200 Max chipset
- Fast 65W charging
- Stylish design
- Reverse wired charging
- Slightly older chipset
- Lower display brightness compared to Reno8
- Slower charging than Reno8
Oppo Reno8
- Faster 80W charging
- Brighter display
- More efficient Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Excellent battery life (105h endurance)
- 'Infinite' contrast ratio is nominal
- Camera details are limited in provided specs
Display Comparison
The Reno8 features a measured peak brightness of 633 nits, significantly brighter than the Reno7 Pro 5G (estimated around 500 nits). While the Reno8 advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value), both phones offer vibrant AMOLED displays with smooth refresh rates. The Reno8's brightness advantage makes it more usable outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature excellent camera systems, but the Reno8 likely benefits from software optimizations and potentially a newer sensor. While specific camera specs are not detailed, expect both to deliver high-quality photos and videos in various lighting conditions. Low-light performance should be comparable.
Performance
The Reno8’s Dimensity 1300 (6nm) offers a slight performance advantage over the Reno7 Pro 5G’s Dimensity 1200 Max. The Dimensity 1300's architecture, with its Cortex-A78 cores, provides a smoother multitasking experience and slightly better gaming performance. Both phones handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Reno8 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 105 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Reno7 Pro 5G also has good battery life, but the Reno8’s optimization and potentially a slightly larger battery give it the edge. The Reno8’s 80W charging is significantly faster than the Reno7 Pro 5G’s 65W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful chipset and a proven track record. The Oppo Reno8 is a better choice for those who value faster charging speeds, a brighter display, and a more modern processor, especially if battery life is a key concern.