Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G vs Oppo Reno7 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 Pro 5G takes the lead with its more powerful Dimensity 1200 Max chipset, offering noticeably better performance. While both offer 65W charging, the Pro's superior processing power and likely improved camera system make it the better choice for most users, despite a potentially higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) | - |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| RGB notification lights around the camera island | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.0 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | ARM G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | PFDM00, CPH2293 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- More powerful Dimensity 1200 Max chipset
- Likely improved camera system
- Faster performance for gaming and multitasking
- Stylish design
- Potentially higher price
- Battery life might be slightly less than Reno7 5G under heavy load
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Excellent battery life (123h endurance rating)
- Stylish design
- Faster charging (65W)
- More affordable
- Less powerful Dimensity 900 chipset
- Potentially less advanced camera system
- Slower performance compared to Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature AMOLED displays with a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate (specifications not explicitly provided). The Reno7 5G boasts a measured 635 nits max brightness, which is respectable. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the Reno7 5G is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data. The Pro model likely has a slightly better display panel with improved color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness, though specific measurements are needed for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Reno7 Pro 5G likely features a more advanced camera system. Expect improvements in image quality, low-light performance, and video recording capabilities. Specific sensor sizes and lens apertures would be needed for a more detailed comparison, but the chipset difference often correlates with camera processing capabilities.
Performance
The Reno7 Pro 5G's Dimensity 1200 Max chipset is significantly more powerful than the Reno7 5G's Dimensity 900. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Pro's Octa-core 3.0 GHz CPU offers a considerable advantage over the Reno7's 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration.
Battery Life
Both phones share the same 65W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in approximately 31 minutes. The Reno7 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery life. The Reno7 Pro 5G's battery capacity is likely similar, but the more powerful chipset might slightly impact overall battery endurance under heavy usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and potentially a more advanced camera system. The Oppo Reno7 5G is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want a stylish Oppo phone with good battery life and a decent camera, and don't need top-tier performance.