Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. The Reno7 Pro 5G and Reno7 offer compelling options, but cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison breaks down their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the perfect device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 Pro 5G takes the lead with its significantly faster Dimensity 1200 Max chipset, 65W charging, and 5G connectivity. However, the Reno7 offers exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly price point, making it a strong contender for value-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2022, April 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| | RGB notification lights around the camera island | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 3.0 GHz | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | ARM G77 MC9 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange |
| Models | PFDM00, CPH2293 | CPH2363 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 127h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Faster Performance (Dimensity 1200 Max)
- 65W Fast Charging
- 5G Connectivity
- Likely Superior Camera System
- Premium Build Quality
- Higher Price
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life than Reno7
Oppo Reno7
- Exceptional Battery Life (127h Endurance Rating)
- More Affordable Price
- Sleek Design
- Good Display Brightness (624 nits)
- Slower Performance (Snapdragon 680 4G)
- 33W Charging (Slower)
- No 5G Connectivity
Display Comparison
The Reno7 boasts a measured peak brightness of 624 nits, offering good visibility outdoors. While the Reno7 Pro 5G's display specs aren't explicitly listed, it likely features a similar or slightly improved panel. Both phones likely offer vibrant colors and sharp details, but the Reno7's brightness gives it a slight edge in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno7 Pro 5G likely has a more advanced setup. While specific camera specs are missing, the Pro model typically includes improved sensors and image processing capabilities. Expect better low-light performance and more detailed photos from the Pro. Both phones offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
Here's where the Reno7 Pro 5G truly shines. The Dimensity 1200 Max chipset is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 680 4G in the Reno7. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the Pro model. The Reno7 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Reno7's endurance rating of 127h is remarkable, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Reno7 Pro 5G, while offering 65W fast charging, likely has a smaller battery capacity and therefore shorter overall battery life. If battery longevity is your top priority, the Reno7 is the clear winner.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and 5G connectivity. It's perfect for gamers, power users, and those who want a premium experience. The Oppo Reno7 is a great choice for users who value long battery life, a sleek design, and a more affordable price tag, without sacrificing essential features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance, 5G, and fast charging, then yes. The Pro model offers a significantly better experience. However, if you're on a budget and value battery life, the Reno7 is a compelling alternative.
❓ What is the difference between the processors in these phones?
The Reno7 Pro 5G uses the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max, a powerful chipset designed for demanding tasks. The Reno7 uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, which is more suited for everyday use and less intensive applications.
