The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno7 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one truly comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the Reno7 Lite thanks to its significantly brighter display, more powerful chipset, and faster software updates. While the Reno7 Lite boasts impressive battery endurance, the A54's overall package provides a more premium and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2343 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 125h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional battery life
- Sleek and stylish design
- Fast charging (33W)
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful chipset (Exynos 1380)
- Samsung's software support and updates
- Generally better camera performance
- Slower charging (25W)
- Battery life slightly less than Reno7 Lite
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's display is a clear winner. With a measured peak brightness of 980 nits, it's significantly brighter than the Reno7 Lite's 657 nits, making it much easier to see outdoors. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the A54's brightness provides a superior viewing experience. The A54 also likely has a higher resolution and potentially a more vibrant color profile, though specific resolution details are missing from the provided specs.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively assess without detailed testing. Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. However, the Galaxy A54 generally has a reputation for better image processing and more versatile camera features, including potentially better low-light performance and video stabilization. The Reno7 Lite may offer unique camera features, but without specifics, the A54 is likely the stronger contender.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset (5nm) offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo Reno7 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Exynos 1380's Cortex-A78 cores provide better CPU performance for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Snapdragon 695 is capable, the A54's chipset is simply more powerful and efficient. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the A54.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 Lite shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 125h. The Samsung Galaxy A54 has an endurance rating of 119h and an active use score of 11:15h. While the difference isn't massive, the Reno7 Lite's endurance rating suggests it will likely last longer on a single charge under typical usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a sleek design on a budget. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, smoother performance, and the reliability of Samsung's software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Reno7 Lite has a slightly higher endurance rating, suggesting it may offer slightly longer battery life under typical usage.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A54 worth the extra money?
Yes, if you prioritize a brighter display, smoother performance, and Samsung's software support, the Galaxy A54 is generally worth the extra investment.
