Oppo Reno7 Lite vs Reno8 T 5G: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G takes the win thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, the Reno8 T 5G's charging speed provides a noticeable advantage in daily use, making it the more practical choice for many.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 Lite | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 125h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.5 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9) GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (125h endurance)
- Bright display (657 nits)
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Camera details are limited
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Fast charging (67W)
- Stylish design
- Reverse wired charging
- Battery life not as impressive as Reno7 Lite
- Contrast ratio specification is nominal
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar display technology, likely AMOLED panels, but the Reno7 Lite boasts a measured peak brightness of 657 nits, which is impressive for its class. The Reno8 T 5G's contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite,' which is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data. Overall, the Reno7 Lite has a slight edge in brightness.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not fully detailed, but both phones are marketed as having strong camera capabilities. Expect similar image quality in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance and video recording quality will likely be comparable, though specific features and software processing may differ. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, ensuring comparable performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Don't expect flagship-level speeds, but both phones should handle most apps smoothly. Software optimization will play a key role in the overall user experience.
Battery Life
The Reno7 Lite shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 125 hours. The Reno8 T 5G, while still offering decent battery life, doesn't match this longevity. However, the Reno8 T 5G compensates with its significantly faster 67W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Lite is a good choice for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a bright display on a budget. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is ideal for those who value fast charging and don't mind a slightly higher price point.