Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. The Reno7 Lite and Reno8 are two compelling options, but which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key differences, helping you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful processor, and slightly brighter display. While the Reno7 Lite boasts exceptional battery life, the Reno8's overall performance and charging speed make it the superior choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 125h
|
Endurance rating 105h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 619610a (v9)
GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (125h)
- More affordable price
- Stylish design
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less refined camera
Oppo Reno8
- Faster processor (Dimensity 1300)
- Significantly faster charging (80W)
- Slightly brighter display
- Premium feel
- Shorter battery life (105h)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Reno8 edges out the Reno7 Lite with a slightly higher peak brightness of 633 nits compared to the Reno7 Lite's 657 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal), resulting in vibrant colors and deep blacks. While the difference in brightness is minimal, the Reno8's display feels more responsive and fluid, likely due to its more powerful chipset.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the Reno8's more powerful processor allows for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Both likely offer similar video recording capabilities, but the Reno8 might offer slightly better stabilization.
Performance
The Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset is a clear winner over the Reno7 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1300's Cortex-A78 cores provide significantly more processing power, resulting in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Reno7 Lite is still capable, but the Reno8 offers a noticeably more premium feel.
Battery Life
The Reno7 Lite shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 125 hours, surpassing the Reno8's 105 hours. However, the Reno8 compensates with its blazing-fast 80W charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 28 minutes, compared to the Reno7 Lite's 63 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a more budget-friendly price point. The Oppo Reno8 is best suited for those who value performance, fast charging, and a smoother user experience, even if it means sacrificing a bit of battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 worth the extra money?
If performance and fast charging are priorities, then yes. The Reno8's Dimensity 1300 chipset and 80W charging offer a significant upgrade over the Reno7 Lite.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Reno7 Lite has a significantly better endurance rating (125h) compared to the Reno8 (105h).
