Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. The Reno7 Lite and Reno7 5G are two compelling options, but which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and slightly brighter display. While the Reno7 Lite offers excellent battery life, the Reno7 5G's performance and charging speed provide a more premium experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 125h
|
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional battery life
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Good display quality
- Slower performance
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster performance
- Significantly faster charging
- Slightly brighter display
- More premium feel
- Higher price
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (though still excellent)
- Potentially less RAM depending on configuration
Display Comparison
Both phones boast vibrant displays with excellent contrast (Infinite nominal). However, the Reno7 5G edges out the Reno7 Lite with a slightly higher peak brightness of 635 nits compared to 657 nits. While the difference is minimal, it can be noticeable in bright sunlight. Both likely use AMOLED panels with a 90Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar in terms of image quality, given both phones are part of the Reno series. Both likely feature a primary 64MP sensor. However, the Reno7 5G's more powerful processor may allow for slightly better image processing and video stabilization. Low-light performance should be comparable.
Performance
The Reno7 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset is a clear winner here. It offers significantly better performance than the Reno7 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G, especially when handling demanding games or multitasking. The Dimensity 900's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and overall speed.
Battery Life
The Reno7 Lite boasts an impressive endurance rating of 125h, slightly surpassing the Reno7 5G's 123h. However, the Reno7 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 31 minutes, compared to the Reno7 Lite's 63 minutes with 33W charging. This makes a huge difference in daily usability.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly price point. It's a great choice for those who don't heavily rely on demanding apps or games. The Oppo Reno7 5G is better suited for users who want faster performance, quicker charging, and a slightly more vibrant display, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 5G worth the extra money?
If you value performance and fast charging, the Reno7 5G is definitely worth the investment. However, if battery life is your top priority and you're on a budget, the Reno7 Lite remains a compelling option.
❓ What is the difference between the Snapdragon 695 and the Dimensity 900?
The Dimensity 900 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 695, offering better performance in gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
