Oppo Reno7 Lite vs Oppo A98: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging. While the Reno7 Lite boasts impressive battery endurance and a brighter display, the A98's charging speed provides a more convenient user experience. Both offer similar performance, making charging the deciding factor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 Lite | Oppo A98 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June | Available. Released 2023, May 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2529 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 125h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.5 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9) GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (125h endurance)
- Brighter display (657 nits)
- Reverse wired charging
- Potentially refined camera software
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Camera specs are unclear
- Design may be less premium than A98
Oppo A98
- Significantly faster charging (67W)
- Likely more modern design
- Same capable Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Lower display brightness
- Camera specs are unclear
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 Lite has a measured peak brightness of 657 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight compared to the A98 (specs for A98 display brightness are unavailable, but generally lower than Reno7 Lite). Both likely feature similar display technology (likely AMOLED or LCD), but the Reno7 Lite's brightness advantage is noticeable. The Reno7 Lite also boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a nominal rating.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both phones. Both are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Without specific sensor sizes, aperture values, or sample images, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Reno7 Lite often features a more refined camera software experience in Oppo's lineup.
Performance
Both devices share the same Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration. Expect similar performance in everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. While the chipset is capable, it's not a flagship powerhouse, so don't expect blazing-fast speeds. Real-world performance will largely depend on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Reno7 Lite shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 125 hours. The A98, while not explicitly stated, likely has a slightly smaller battery capacity than the Reno7 Lite. The A98's 67W charging compensates for this, allowing it to charge much faster than the Reno7 Lite's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. The Oppo A98 is a better choice for those who value rapid charging and don't mind a slightly less vibrant screen. Consider your charging habits and display preferences when making your decision.