The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno7 Lite and Honor Magic5 Lite are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer attractive designs and a range of features, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic5 Lite edges out the Oppo Reno7 Lite thanks to its significantly brighter display and faster charging. While both share the same capable Snapdragon 695 chipset, the Magic5 Lite's superior screen and charging speed make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2023, February 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June | Available. Released 2023, February 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 40W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Titanium Silver |
| Models | CPH2343 | RMO-NX1, RMO-NX3 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 125h
|
Endurance rating 111h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
-31.4 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 387250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1912 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (125h endurance)
- Sleek and stylish design
- Reverse wired charging
- Lower display brightness compared to Magic5 Lite
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Camera performance details are unclear
Honor Magic5 Lite
- Brighter display (864 nits)
- Faster charging (40W)
- Modern design
- Slightly shorter battery life compared to Reno7 Lite
- Camera performance details are unclear
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic5 Lite takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 864 nits, significantly higher than the Reno7 Lite's 657 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both phones feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value, indicating very high contrast), and likely use similar AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Magic5 Lite's brighter screen is a noticeable advantage.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively declare a winner without extensive testing. Both phones are marketed as having capable camera systems, but detailed image quality comparisons would require a side-by-side analysis. Expect decent photo and video capabilities in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance may be a weakness for both.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, paired with an Octa-core CPU. Performance should be very similar in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance, but both devices are capable of handling most apps and games smoothly. RAM and storage configurations will likely vary by region, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 Lite holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 125h endurance rating compared to the Honor Magic5 Lite's 111h. However, the Honor Magic5 Lite compensates with 40W wired charging, significantly faster than the Reno7 Lite's 33W charging. While the Reno7 Lite lasts longer on a single charge, the Magic5 Lite can be topped up more quickly.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Lite is a good option for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a slightly more refined design. The Honor Magic5 Lite is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, faster charging, and a more modern aesthetic.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Reno7 Lite has a slightly better endurance rating (125h) compared to the Honor Magic5 Lite (111h), suggesting it will last longer on a single charge.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 5G chipset good for gaming?
The Snapdragon 695 5G is a capable mid-range chipset that can handle most games at moderate settings. Don't expect flagship-level gaming performance, but it's suitable for casual and mid-core gamers.
