Oppo Reno7 5G vs Oppo Reno8 T 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 5G boasts faster charging and a potentially brighter display, while the Reno8 T 5G offers a more modern chipset. Ultimately, the Reno7 5G edges out the Reno8 T 5G for those prioritizing charging speed and display brightness, but the Reno8 T 5G provides a more future-proof processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 5G | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 04 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 17 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stary Black, Startrails Blue | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | CPH2371 | CPH2505 |
| Price | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 | About 340 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- Potentially Brighter Display (635 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- Older Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Camera details less clear
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- More Modern Chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Likely better future software support
- Sleek Design (typical of Reno series)
- Slightly slower charging (67W)
- Potentially less bright display
- Camera details less clear
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, likely with a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate (general knowledge). The Reno7 5G is reported to have a peak brightness of 635 nits, which is notably higher than what's typically seen on the Reno8 T 5G (estimated around 500-550 nits based on typical specs). This difference could make the Reno7 5G easier to view in direct sunlight. Contrast ratio is likely excellent on both due to the OLED panels.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully detailed, but both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance and video recording capabilities will depend on the specific sensor and software processing, requiring further testing to determine a clear winner.
Performance
The Reno8 T 5G utilizes the Snapdragon 695 5G, a more modern chipset than the Reno7 5G's Dimensity 900. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 695 5G generally offers better efficiency and slightly improved gaming performance. The Dimensity 900 is still a solid performer, but the 695 5G has a slight edge in longevity and future-proofing.
Battery Life
The Reno7 5G has a reported endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. It also features 65W wired charging, which is significantly faster than the Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging (though the difference is minimal in practice). Both support reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 5G is ideal for users who value rapid charging and a potentially brighter screen for outdoor visibility. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is a better choice for those seeking a more recent chipset for improved performance and future software updates, especially if gaming or demanding apps are a priority.