Oppo Reno7 5G vs Oppo Reno7 Z 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 5G takes the lead with its significantly faster charging and more powerful chipset. However, the Reno7 Z 5G offers a more budget-friendly price point and a sleek design, making it a strong contender for value-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 5G | Oppo Reno7 Z 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 04 | 2022, March 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 17 | Available. Released 2022, March 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| - | IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stary Black, Startrails Blue | Black, Rainbow |
| Models | CPH2371 | CPH2343 |
| Price | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Higher Display Brightness (635 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design might be less distinctive than Reno7 Z 5G
Oppo Reno7 Z 5G
- More Affordable
- Sleek and Stylish Design
- Good Battery Life
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Lower Display Brightness
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno7 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, providing better visibility in bright sunlight compared to the Reno7 Z 5G (estimated around 450-500 nits). While both have similar resolutions, the Reno7 5G's higher brightness gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno7 5G likely has a slight advantage in video recording quality due to its more powerful chipset. Both offer similar main sensor resolution (around 64MP) and ultrawide lenses. Low-light performance is expected to be comparable, though the Reno7 5G's processing might yield slightly better results. Detailed camera testing would be needed for a definitive conclusion.
Performance
The Reno7 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games on the Reno7 5G. The Dimensity 900 also generally offers better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Reno7 5G's endurance rating of 123h is exceptional, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the real differentiator is its 65W wired charging, which can fully charge the phone in just 31 minutes. The Reno7 Z 5G's 33W charging is considerably slower, taking around 63 minutes for a full charge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 5G is ideal for users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and a slightly more premium feel. The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G is a great choice for those seeking a stylish 5G phone with a good camera and battery life without breaking the bank.