The Oppo Reno series consistently delivers stylish designs and impressive features. But with two Reno7 models – the 5G and the standard version – choosing the right one can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging, superior chipset, and 5G connectivity. While the Reno7 boasts slightly better battery endurance, the Reno7 5G's overall performance and future-proofing make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 04 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 17 | Available. Released 2022, April 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Stary Black, Startrails Blue | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange |
| Models | CPH2371 | CPH2363 |
| Price | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 | About 240 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 123h
|
Endurance rating 127h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly Brighter Display
- Slightly lower battery endurance (123h) compared to Reno7
Oppo Reno7
- Slightly Better Battery Endurance (127h)
- Potentially Lower Price
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 680 4G)
- No 5G Connectivity
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a similar design and likely use AMOLED panels with a 90Hz refresh rate (though refresh rate is not explicitly stated in the provided specs). The Reno7 5G has a slightly higher peak brightness of 635 nits compared to the Reno7's 624 nits, suggesting marginally better outdoor visibility. Both have an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, which is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general knowledge, both likely feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the Reno7 5G's more powerful processor might offer slightly better image processing and low-light performance.
Performance
The Reno7 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset is a clear winner here. It offers significantly more processing power than the Reno7's Snapdragon 680 4G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the 5G model. The Dimensity 900 also benefits from 6nm process, which is more efficient than the 6nm Snapdragon 680.
Battery Life
The Reno7 edges out the Reno7 5G slightly in battery endurance, with a rating of 127h versus 123h. However, the Reno7 5G's 65W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 31 minutes, compared to the Reno7's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 5G is ideal for users who prioritize speed, 5G connectivity, and fast charging. The Oppo Reno7 is a good option for those on a tighter budget who value slightly longer battery life and don't need 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 5G worth the extra cost?
If you value performance, 5G connectivity, and fast charging, then yes, the Reno7 5G is worth the extra investment. The Snapdragon 680 is adequate, but the Dimensity 900 offers a noticeable upgrade.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Reno7 has a slightly better endurance rating (127h) compared to the Reno7 5G (123h), but the Reno7 5G's faster charging significantly reduces downtime.
