Oppo Reno7 5G vs Oppo Reno5 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G edges out the Reno5 5G thanks to its slightly faster chipset, improved battery endurance, and quicker charging. While the Reno5 5G remains a solid choice, the Reno7 5G provides a more modern and refined experience overall.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 5G | Oppo Reno5 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 04 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 17 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stary Black, Startrails Blue | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | CPH2371 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 | About 160 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | -30.4 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Better Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- Faster Charging (31 min)
- Potentially Improved Camera Processing
- Slightly More Modern Design
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design may be too similar to previous models for some
Oppo Reno5 5G
- More Affordable
- Solid Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Stylish Design
- Reliable Camera
- Slower Chipset (Snapdragon 765G)
- Shorter Battery Life (109h Endurance)
- Slightly Slower Charging (35 min)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar displays with a measured max brightness of around 635 nits, offering good visibility even in bright sunlight. The contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' (nominal) for both, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. While the difference is minimal, the Reno7 5G might have slightly improved color accuracy due to potential software enhancements.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno7 5G likely has slight improvements in image processing and low-light performance. While specific camera specs aren't detailed, the newer chipset and potential software optimizations in the Reno7 5G suggest a marginal advantage in photo and video quality. Both likely feature a main sensor around 64MP and ultrawide lens.
Performance
The Reno7 5G boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 900, a more powerful chipset than the Reno5 5G's Snapdragon 765G. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in graphically intensive games. The Dimensity 900's 6nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Reno7 5G demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, with an endurance rating of 123h compared to the Reno5 5G's 109h. This means the Reno7 5G will comfortably last a full day, even with heavy usage. Both phones support 65W fast charging, but the Reno7 5G charges slightly faster (31 minutes vs 35 minutes).
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 5G is ideal for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and fast charging. It's a great choice for those who enjoy mobile gaming or demanding apps. The Oppo Reno5 5G is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who still want a stylish phone with a decent camera and reliable performance for everyday tasks.