Xiaomi 13T vs Oppo Reno7 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8200 Ultra delivers significantly higher performance, coupled with a brighter display and faster 67W charging. While the Reno7 5G offers respectable efficiency, the 13T’s overall package provides better value and future-proofing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 5G (China) | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Red (New Year Edition) | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PFJM10 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 380 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno7 5G (China)
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Potentially more streamlined software experience (depending on ColorOS version)
- 60W fast charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the Dimensity 8200 Ultra
- Display likely less bright than the Xiaomi 13T
- Limited information on camera specifications
Xiaomi 13T
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset
- Bright 1264 nit display
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4 support
- Potentially higher power consumption
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- May run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno7 5G. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While panel technology isn't specified for either, the 13T’s higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the 13T’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor use and HDR content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information for the Reno7 5G is lacking. The Xiaomi 13T’s camera is described as 'Photo / Video' suggesting a versatile setup, but specifics are needed for a full assessment. Assuming a typical mid-range configuration for the Reno7 5G, the 13T likely holds an advantage in image processing capabilities due to its more powerful chipset, enabling faster and more complex algorithms. The absence of details on the Reno7 5G’s main sensor size and aperture makes a direct comparison difficult, but the 13T’s processing power is a key differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13T’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno7 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The Dimensity 8200 Ultra features a 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, alongside three 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, contrasting with the Reno7’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and four 1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architectural advantage, combined with the smaller process node, results in significantly improved CPU and GPU performance on the 13T, benefiting demanding applications and gaming. The 13T is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T demonstrates superior battery endurance with an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101 hours. While the Reno7 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, the 13T’s longer runtime suggests a more efficient combination of hardware and software optimization. Furthermore, the 13T supports 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 42 minutes, while the Reno7 5G is limited to 60W. The 13T also supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering broader compatibility with fast chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G (China) if you prioritize a more streamlined software experience and value efficient power consumption for everyday tasks. It’s a solid choice for users who don’t heavily game or require top-tier processing power. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you demand raw performance for gaming, content creation, or multitasking, and appreciate a brighter, more vibrant display alongside faster charging speeds.