The vivo X90s and Oppo Reno7 5G (China variant) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Reno7 5G, powered by the Snapdragon 778G, aims for a balance of features and affordability. The X90s, however, steps up with the flagship-tier Dimensity 9200+ chipset, promising a significant performance boost, but at a higher price point. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X90s is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset offers substantially faster performance and future-proofing, while the 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the Reno7 5G remains a capable device, the X90s’ performance advantage justifies the price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2023, June 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2023, June 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 197.5 / 201.5 / 202.2 / 203.5 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+B2c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 60W wired
5W reverse wired | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4810 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Red (New Year Edition) | Black, White, Red, Green |
| Models | PFJM10 | V2241HA |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 510 EUR |
Oppo Reno7 5G (China)
- More affordable price point
- Good all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Respectable 60W charging
- Significantly less powerful processor than the X90s
- May struggle with demanding games and multitasking
vivo X90s
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 9200+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially higher power consumption
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), specific details like peak brightness and refresh rates are missing. However, the core difference lies in the processing power driving the display. The Dimensity 9200+ in the X90s has a more powerful ISP, potentially leading to better image processing for display output. Bezels are likely comparable given both brands' focus on aesthetics. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, but both should offer vibrant and punchy visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, we can infer differences based on chipset capabilities. The Dimensity 9200+'s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) will enable faster image processing, better noise reduction, and potentially more advanced computational photography features on the X90s. While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the X90s will likely benefit from more sophisticated algorithms for HDR, night mode, and portrait photography. The Reno7 5G will still capture good images, but the X90s will offer a more refined and versatile camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) in the vivo X90s boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A715 cores at 3.0 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This architecture is a substantial leap over the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) in the Reno7 5G, which uses a Cortex-A78 prime core at 2.4 GHz, three Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9200+ also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning sustained performance under load will be higher, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X90s will handle graphically intensive tasks and multitasking with ease, while the Reno7 5G may show signs of strain.
Battery Life
The Reno7 5G offers 60W wired charging, a respectable speed, but the X90s’ 120W charging is a game-changer. vivo claims a 50% charge in just 8 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the X90s effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Snapdragon 778G is also more power efficient than the Dimensity 9200+, but the X90s' charging speed will likely offset this.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G (China) if you prioritize a more affordable price point and still need a smooth, everyday smartphone experience for social media, browsing, and casual gaming. Buy the vivo X90s if you demand top-tier performance for demanding games, multitasking, and content creation, and value the convenience of ultra-fast charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 9200+ in the vivo X90s get noticeably hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9200+ is a powerful chip, the 4nm process and vivo’s thermal management system are designed to mitigate overheating. It will get warm, but should not throttle excessively during typical gaming sessions. The Reno7 5G's Snapdragon 778G will likely run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 60W charging on the Oppo Reno7 5G slow compared to the 120W on the vivo X90s?
60W is a respectable charging speed, but 120W is significantly faster. The X90s can reach 50% charge in around 8 minutes, while the Reno7 5G will take considerably longer to fully charge. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Will the Reno7 5G struggle with demanding apps like video editing software?
The Snapdragon 778G is capable, but the Reno7 5G may exhibit slowdowns or longer processing times when handling demanding tasks like 4K video editing. The X90s’ Dimensity 9200+ is much better equipped for such workloads, offering a smoother and more efficient experience.
