The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno7 5G and vivo V23 5G are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer stylish designs and a compelling feature set, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G edges out the vivo V23 5G thanks to its superior Snapdragon 778G chipset, faster 60W charging, and generally smoother performance. While the V23 5G boasts impressive battery life and a bright display, the Reno7's power advantage makes it the slightly better choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 60W wired
5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Red (New Year Edition) | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black |
| Models | PFJM10 | V2130, V2303 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9)
GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 5G (China)
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- Faster Charging (60W)
- Likely Higher Refresh Rate Display
- Potentially Better Low-Light Camera
- Battery Life Not as Exceptional as V23
- Selfie Camera May Not Be as Strong
vivo V23 5G
- Exceptional Battery Life (103h Endurance Rating)
- Bright Display (629 nits)
- Potentially Stronger Selfie Camera
- Stylish Design
- Slower Processor (Dimensity 920)
- Slower Charging (44W)
- Likely 60Hz Display
- Performance May Struggle with Demanding Tasks
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The vivo V23 5G measures a peak brightness of 629 nits, which is impressive, while the Reno7 5G's brightness is likely comparable. The V23's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but AMOLEDs inherently offer excellent contrast. The Reno7 likely has a slightly higher refresh rate (90Hz vs V23's likely 60Hz), contributing to smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The vivo V23 5G is often praised for its selfie camera, potentially offering better image processing for portraits. The Reno7 5G likely has a more versatile main camera setup, potentially with better low-light performance due to the Snapdragon's image signal processor (ISP). Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing.
Performance
Here, the Oppo Reno7 5G takes a clear lead. The Snapdragon 778G is a more powerful chipset than the Dimensity 920, offering better CPU and GPU performance. Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Reno7. The Dimensity 920 is still capable, but it won't match the Reno7's raw power.
Battery Life
The vivo V23 5G shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 103 hours suggests exceptional battery life, significantly outperforming most smartphones. The Oppo Reno7 5G's battery is likely smaller, and while its 60W charging is faster than the V23's 44W, the V23 will likely last much longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 5G is ideal for users prioritizing performance and fast charging. If you're a heavy gamer or multitasker, the Reno7's chipset will be a noticeable upgrade. The vivo V23 5G is a great pick for those who value long battery life and a vibrant display, especially if camera quality is a key consideration.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno7 5G is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset.
❓ Does the vivo V23 5G have a good camera?
Yes, the vivo V23 5G has a good camera, particularly for selfies. However, the Oppo Reno7 5G may offer more versatility with its main camera system.
