The Oppo Reno7 5G (China) and Realme GT Neo 5 240W represent distinct approaches to the mid-to-high range smartphone market. The Reno7 prioritizes a balanced experience, while the GT Neo 5 aggressively targets charging speed and raw performance. This comparison dissects their core differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a more refined experience, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers significantly more processing power, and the 240W charging is a game-changer, despite the Reno7's respectable 60W offering.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 60W wired
5W reverse wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Red (New Year Edition) | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | PFJM10 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Oppo Reno7 5G (China)
- More efficient chipset for longer battery life during light use.
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS).
- Likely more compact and easier to handle.
- Significantly lower performance compared to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
- Slower charging speed (60W vs 240W).
- Less capable for demanding games and applications.
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging.
- Superior performance with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
- Likely a higher refresh rate display for smoother gaming.
- Potentially higher thermal throttling under sustained load.
- May have shorter battery life during heavy use.
- Potentially larger and heavier design.
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given the Reno7's positioning, it likely features a 6.5-6.7 inch AMOLED panel with a standard refresh rate. The GT Neo 5, being a gaming-focused device, likely boasts a higher refresh rate (120Hz or higher) AMOLED display. The GT Neo 5's panel is also likely brighter, catering to visibility during intense gaming sessions. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the GT Neo 5 may have slightly thinner bezels to maximize screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the GT Neo 5, positioned as a performance flagship, likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities than the Reno7. The Reno7 likely focuses on balanced image quality with a strong emphasis on portrait photography, typical of Oppo's image processing style. The GT Neo 5 may lean towards more vibrant and contrast-rich images, appealing to a gaming audience. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is probable on the GT Neo 5's main camera, enhancing low-light performance and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo 5’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno7 5G’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 performance cores, offering significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. The 778G, while capable, is geared towards efficiency with its Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and superior gaming performance on the GT Neo 5. The 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 1 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, though the GT Neo 5's higher performance will still generate more heat. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the GT Neo 5 may benefit from faster RAM speeds to complement its powerful chipset.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5’s 240W charging is the standout feature. Claimed 0-50% in 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes is a massive advantage over the Reno7’s 60W charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the GT Neo 5's faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Reno7’s 60W charging is still respectable, providing a full charge in around 45-60 minutes, but it can't compete with the GT Neo 5's speed. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is more power-hungry, so the GT Neo 5 will likely require more frequent charging despite the fast replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G (China) if you need a well-rounded device with a focus on efficiency and a more manageable thermal profile for everyday tasks. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means potentially more heat under sustained load.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme GT Neo 5 240W's battery degrade quickly due to the extreme charging speed?
While concerns about battery degradation are valid, Realme has implemented several technologies to mitigate this, including GaN chargers and intelligent charging algorithms. These features regulate voltage and temperature during charging, minimizing stress on the battery. However, long-term degradation will still occur, as with any lithium-ion battery, but it shouldn't be significantly faster than with conventional charging methods.
❓ Is the 240W charging compatible with standard USB-PD chargers?
No, the 240W charging requires Realme's proprietary SuperDart Charge protocol and the included charger. Standard USB-PD chargers will not deliver the full 240W and will charge the device at a much slower rate. Using a non-compatible charger is safe, but you won't experience the rapid charging speeds.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Oppo Reno7 5G still offer a good gaming experience?
The Snapdragon 778G is a capable mid-range chipset and can handle most mobile games at medium to high settings. However, it will struggle with the most demanding titles at maximum settings and may exhibit frame drops during prolonged gaming sessions. The GT Neo 5's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a significantly smoother and more consistent gaming experience.
