Oppo Reno7 5G (China) vs. Oppo Reno7 5G: Which One Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Dimensity 900 variant generally edges out the Snapdragon 778G version due to its faster charging, potentially slightly better sustained performance, and often a more competitive price. However, the Snapdragon variant offers excellent efficiency and a well-rounded experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 5G (China) | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Red (New Year Edition) | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | PFJM10 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 5G (China)
- Excellent power efficiency
- Balanced performance
- Stylish design
- Good camera
- Slower charging speed (60W)
- Slightly lower peak performance compared to Dimensity
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster charging (65W)
- Potentially slightly better sustained performance
- Competitive price (often)
- Stylish design
- Good camera
- May consume more power than Snapdragon variant
- Performance gains over Snapdragon may be marginal for some users
Display Comparison
Both Reno7 5G models feature a similar AMOLED display, likely with a 90Hz refresh rate. The Dimensity version boasts a contrast ratio of 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors, while the Snapdragon version measures 635 nits max brightness, which is still respectable for outdoor visibility. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be very similar between the two models, as they share the same hardware. Expect good image quality in well-lit conditions, with decent low-light performance. Software processing will play a significant role in the final image quality, and Oppo's optimizations might differ slightly between the two variants.
Performance
The Dimensity 900 generally offers a slight edge in raw performance compared to the Snapdragon 778G. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming, the Dimensity's CPU configuration (2x Cortex-A78 cores) might provide a smoother experience in demanding applications. The Snapdragon 778G, however, is known for its excellent power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both models share an endurance rating of 123h, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Dimensity 900 variant boasts 65W wired charging, significantly faster than the Snapdragon version's 60W. The Dimensity version can reach 100% charge in approximately 31 minutes, a considerable advantage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 5G (Snapdragon) is ideal for users prioritizing efficient performance and a balanced experience. The Oppo Reno7 5G (Dimensity) is a better choice for those who value faster charging speeds and potentially slightly higher peak performance, especially within a budget.