Oppo Reno7 5G vs Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G: A Clash of Flagship Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Pro 5G edges out the Reno7 5G thanks to its slightly faster Dimensity 1200 chipset and quicker charging. However, the Reno7 5G offers a more efficient Snapdragon 778G and a potentially better long-term software support. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 5G (China) | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2021, June 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) | 160 x 73.1 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 - International UFS 3.1 - China | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Red (New Year Edition) | Black, Blue, Aurora, Majestic Gold, Diwali Edition |
| Models | PFJM10 | PEPM00, CPH2249 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno7 5G (China)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 778G)
- Potentially longer software support
- Slightly more modern chipset architecture
- Good camera performance
- Slightly slower performance than Reno6 Pro 5G
- Slower charging speed (60W)
- May have limited availability outside China
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G
- Faster performance (Dimensity 1200)
- Faster charging (65W)
- Excellent display quality
- Established device with readily available reviews
- Potentially shorter software support lifespan
- Less power-efficient chipset
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.55-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate. While both offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling, the Reno6 Pro 5G might have slightly better color accuracy due to its slightly higher peak brightness. Resolution is likely 1080 x 2400 pixels on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones boast impressive camera systems. The Reno6 Pro 5G typically features a 50MP main sensor, while the Reno7 5G often has a 64MP main sensor. Image quality is generally excellent on both, with good dynamic range and detail. Video recording capabilities are also comparable, supporting 4K at 60fps.
Performance
The Reno6 Pro 5G's Dimensity 1200 generally provides a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 778G in the Reno7 5G, particularly in demanding games and multitasking. However, the Snapdragon 778G is more power-efficient, potentially leading to better battery life under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Reno6 Pro 5G has a slight advantage with its 65W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the Reno7 5G's 60W charging. Battery capacity is likely around 4500mAh on both devices, with the Snapdragon 778G potentially offering slightly better overall battery life due to its efficiency.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 5G is ideal for users prioritizing efficiency, potentially longer software updates, and a slightly more modern chipset. The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G is a better choice for those who demand raw performance and faster charging speeds, especially if they're looking for a slightly more established device.