Oppo Reno7 5G (China) vs Huawei Mate 50E: A Deep Dive into the Snapdragon 778G Experience
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially a more streamlined software experience (depending on region), the Huawei Mate 50E edges out the Oppo Reno7 5G. The 66W charging offers a tangible benefit, while the shared Snapdragon 778G ensures comparable performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 5G (China) | Huawei Mate 50E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 03 | Available. Released 2022, October 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) | 161.5 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.36 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~442 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | HarmonyOS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4460 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Red (New Year Edition) | Black, Silver, Purple |
| Models | PFJM10 | CET-AL60 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 580 EUR |
Oppo Reno7 5G (China)
- Potentially more aggressive cooling for sustained performance.
- Oppo's ColorOS offers a wide range of customization options.
- Generally wider availability in certain markets.
- Slower 60W charging compared to the Mate 50E.
- ColorOS can be perceived as bloated by some users.
Huawei Mate 50E
- Faster 66W wired charging for quicker top-ups.
- Huawei's image processing algorithms are typically excellent.
- Potentially more refined software experience (depending on region).
- Limited access to Google Mobile Services in some regions.
- Software updates may be less frequent compared to Oppo.
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market positioning, we can infer both likely utilize AMOLED panels. The absence of refresh rate data suggests a standard 60Hz panel on both. The real-world difference will likely come down to color calibration and peak brightness, areas where Huawei historically excels. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to declare a clear winner, but Huawei's display tuning often prioritizes color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications beyond the chipset. Given Huawei's strong camera reputation, the Mate 50E likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms, even with potentially similar sensor hardware. Huawei's computational photography is a key strength, often extracting more detail and dynamic range from its sensors. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a definitive comparison impossible, but Huawei's history suggests a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) chipset is the heart of both phones, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration identical in both devices: 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. This means CPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable. The GPU performance will also be identical. The key differentiator will be thermal management. While both use a 6nm process, Oppo's cooling solutions are often more aggressive, potentially allowing for sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. However, without thermal testing data, this remains speculative.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 50E boasts 66W wired charging, a clear advantage over the Oppo Reno7 5G's 60W charging. While both offer 5W reverse wired charging, the faster charging speed of the Mate 50E translates to significantly reduced charging times. A full 0-100% charge on the Mate 50E will likely be 10-15 minutes faster than on the Reno7 5G. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G (China) if you prioritize a potentially more vibrant software ecosystem and are comfortable with the slightly slower 60W charging. Buy the Huawei Mate 50E if you value faster charging speeds and a potentially more refined, albeit restricted, software experience due to ongoing geopolitical factors impacting Huawei's access to Google Mobile Services.