The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT and Oppo Reno6 represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F3 GT aggressively targets gamers with its powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset and rapid charging, while the Oppo Reno6 prioritizes a balanced experience with a more efficient Snapdragon 720G and sleek design. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds. However, the Oppo Reno6 offers a more refined, power-efficient experience for everyday tasks and benefits from a more streamlined software experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 27 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, PD2.0 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora, Stellar Black | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | CPH2235 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno6
- Faster charging with 67W support
- More powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially more aggressive design
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Sleek and stylish design
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 720G
- Refined software experience
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset for gaming
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display, but differences exist. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing for both, the focus here is on the underlying processing power needed to drive them. The Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 has a more powerful GPU, suggesting it can handle higher refresh rates and more demanding graphics without significant performance drops. The Reno6’s Snapdragon 720G, while capable, will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates in graphically intensive games. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco F3 GT will prioritize speed and features over ultimate image quality, while the Reno6 may lean towards more refined image processing. The Reno6, being part of Oppo’s Reno series, likely benefits from Oppo’s established camera algorithms. The Dimensity 1200’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is capable, but the Snapdragon 720G’s ISP is also respectable. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive comparison impossible, but the Reno6 likely has a slight edge in still image quality due to brand focus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno6’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The Dimensity 1200 features a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core, alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering significantly higher peak performance compared to the Reno6’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver configuration. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also contributes to better power efficiency under heavy load, potentially mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Reno6’s 8nm process, while decent, will likely result in more noticeable throttling.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT’s 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min) is a significant advantage over the Reno6’s 50W wired charging (PD2.0). This translates to a much faster recharge time, crucial for gamers who need to quickly get back into the action. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Poco F3 GT effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Reno6’s 50W charging is still respectable, but the Poco F3 GT’s charging speed is a clear win.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 if you need a stylish, well-rounded smartphone with good battery life and a focus on everyday usability. It’s ideal for social media users, content consumers, and those who value a balanced experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize gaming performance, fast charging, and don't mind a slightly more aggressive design. It’s the better choice for mobile gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and some heat generation is inevitable during extended gaming. However, the 6nm process node and Xiaomi’s cooling solutions (likely including vapor chamber cooling) are designed to mitigate thermal throttling. While it may get warm, it should maintain stable performance for reasonable gaming durations.
❓ Is the 50W charging on the Oppo Reno6 fast enough for daily use?
50W charging is still considered fast charging and will adequately recharge the Reno6 overnight or provide a significant boost in a short period. While not as rapid as the Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging, it’s sufficient for most users’ needs.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 720G in the Reno6 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 720G can run Genshin Impact, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT will provide a significantly better experience with higher settings and more stable performance.
