The Oppo Reno6 and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which phone best suits your needs, focusing on performance, display quality, and charging capabilities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a generally brighter display, the Oppo Reno6 emerges as the slightly better choice. Its 50W charging significantly reduces downtime, while the display, though not specified in detail, benefits from Oppo’s display tuning. However, the Mi 11 Lite remains a strong contender, particularly for those valuing a lightweight design and potentially longer battery endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 27 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, PD2.0 | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora, Stellar Black | Boba Black (Vinyl Black), Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral), Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue) |
| Models | CPH2235 | M2101K9AG, M2101K9AI |
| Price | About 150 EUR | £ 221.40 / € 106.34 |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 290172 (v8), 294251 (v9)
GeekBench: 1796 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6
- Faster 50W charging with PD2.0
- Potentially brighter display (based on brand reputation)
- Slightly more modern software features (typical of Oppo)
- Chipset is a generation older than the Mi 11 Lite
- Limited display specifications available
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
- Lighter and more portable design
- Higher measured peak display brightness (826 nits)
- Slightly newer Snapdragon 732G chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- May require more frequent charging due to slower speeds
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite boasts a measured peak brightness of 826 nits, a significant advantage in outdoor visibility compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno6. While the Mi 11 Lite’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite (nominal)’ – a common marketing term – the Reno6’s display characteristics are less defined. The absence of details like panel type (AMOLED vs LCD) or refresh rate for the Reno6 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Mi 11 Lite’s higher peak brightness provides a clear advantage for users who consume content outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a definitive camera comparison is challenging. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes a groundbreaking camera experience. It’s reasonable to assume both rely on software processing to enhance image quality, and the user experience will likely depend more on personal preference for color science and processing style than raw hardware capabilities. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size.
Performance
Both phones utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon 7-series chipsets fabricated on an 8nm process, but the Mi 11 Lite features the Snapdragon 732G, a slightly newer iteration than the Reno6’s Snapdragon 720G. The 732G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores, clocked at 2.3 GHz, are architecturally similar to the Reno6’s Kryo 465 Gold cores, but benefit from incremental improvements in efficiency and performance. While both CPUs share a 2+6 core configuration with the same clock speeds, the 732G’s GPU offers a modest performance uplift. This translates to slightly smoother gaming and faster app loading times on the Mi 11 Lite, though the difference is unlikely to be dramatic in everyday use. Thermal management will be key; the 732G’s slight edge could be negated by a less efficient cooling solution in either device.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno6 and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Reno6’s 50W wired charging with PD2.0 support provides a significant advantage in terms of charging speed. This allows for a much faster 0-100% charge compared to the Mi 11 Lite’s 33W charging. While the Mi 11 Lite may offer slightly longer screen-on time due to potential software optimizations, the Reno6’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery capacity, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 if you need rapid charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery throughout the day. It’s ideal for users who prioritize convenience and a vibrant viewing experience. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite if you prefer a lighter, more portable device with a focus on all-day battery life and a sleek aesthetic. It’s a great choice for users who aren’t as concerned with the absolute fastest charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in the Reno6 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 720G can handle Genshin Impact, but you’ll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The 732G in the Mi 11 Lite offers a slight performance advantage, potentially allowing for slightly higher settings, but neither phone will deliver a flagship-level gaming experience.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Oppo Reno6 with the 50W charger?
Oppo claims a full charge from 0-100% with the 50W charger takes approximately 48 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Mi 11 Lite’s 33W charging, which typically takes around 1 hour and 15 minutes.
❓ Is the Mi 11 Lite’s lightweight design noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the Mi 11 Lite is exceptionally lightweight, making it comfortable to hold and use for extended periods, especially one-handed. This is a key differentiator for users who prioritize portability and ergonomics.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
Neither Oppo nor Xiaomi typically include microSD card slots in their mid-range devices. Users should carefully consider their storage needs and choose a model with sufficient internal storage (128GB or 256GB) accordingly.
