The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno6 and Samsung Galaxy A52 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at a reasonable price, but which one comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, from display and performance to camera and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52 edges out the Oppo Reno6 thanks to its brighter display, more established software support, and slightly more versatile camera system. However, the Reno6 boasts significantly faster charging, making it a strong choice for those prioritizing speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 27 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, PD2.0 | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora, Stellar Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | CPH2235 | SM-A525F, SM-A525F/DS, SM-A525M, SM-A525M/DS |
| Price | About 150 EUR | C$ 699.00 / £ 129.99 / € 169.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 105h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.0 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 261282 (v8)
GeekBench: 5865 (v4.4), 1577 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6
- 50W Fast Charging
- Sleek Design
- Vibrant AMOLED Display
- Good Performance for the Price
- Less Versatile Camera
- Potentially Shorter Software Support
- Lower Display Brightness than A52
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Brighter Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Versatile Camera System
- Samsung's Software Support
- Slower Charging
- Design Less Distinctive
- Performance Similar to Reno6
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52's display shines with a measured peak brightness of 794 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno6 has a good AMOLED display, it doesn't reach the same brightness levels. The A52's infinite contrast ratio also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience. The Reno6's display is still vibrant and color accurate, but the A52 takes the lead here.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A52 offers a more versatile camera system, typically including an ultrawide lens and potentially a macro lens (depending on the specific variant). While both phones capture decent photos, the A52's image processing tends to be more consistent and reliable. The Reno6's camera is capable, but may struggle slightly in low-light conditions compared to the A52.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance will be largely similar for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance from either device, but they're both capable of handling most apps smoothly. Slight variations in software optimization could lead to minor differences in real-world speed.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A52 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 105 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. The Reno6's battery life is good, but not as exceptional. However, the Reno6 compensates with its 50W fast charging, allowing it to top up significantly faster than the A52's 25W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 is ideal for users who value fast charging and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a better fit for those who prioritize a vibrant display, longer software support, and a more reliable camera experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 generally receives longer software updates and security patches due to Samsung's commitment to supporting its devices.
❓ Is the Oppo Reno6 good for gaming?
The Oppo Reno6 is capable of handling most mobile games, but don't expect flagship-level performance. It's best suited for casual and mid-range gaming.
