The Oppo Reno series consistently delivers stylish designs and impressive features. The Reno6 and Reno6 Pro 5G are two compelling options, but which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will break down the key differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Pro 5G takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 1200 chipset and 5G connectivity. While the Reno6 offers a more affordable entry point, the Pro's performance and faster charging make it the superior choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 27 | Available. Released 2021, June 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160 x 73.1 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 - International
UFS 3.1 - China |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, PD2.0 | 65W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora, Stellar Black | Black, Blue, Aurora, Majestic Gold, Diwali Edition |
| Models | CPH2235 | PEPM00, CPH2249 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno6
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Smooth 90Hz display
- Good camera for the price
- Slower performance
- No 5G connectivity
- Slower charging speed
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G
- Faster performance (Dimensity 1200)
- 5G connectivity
- Faster 65W charging
- Improved camera quality
- More expensive
- Slightly heavier
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate and a Full HD+ resolution. While the quality is similar, the Pro might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to potential panel variations. The Reno6 Pro 5G has a slightly smaller hole-punch camera cutout.
Camera Comparison
Both phones boast a versatile triple-camera system. The Reno6 features a 64MP main sensor, 8MP ultrawide, and 2MP macro lens. The Reno6 Pro 5G upgrades to a 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultrawide, and 2MP macro lens. The Pro generally captures better detail and dynamic range, especially in low light, thanks to its improved sensor and image processing.
Performance
The Dimensity 1200 in the Reno6 Pro 5G is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 720G in the Reno6. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance on the Pro. The Reno6 is still capable for everyday use, but struggles with demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Reno6 Pro 5G has a 4500mAh battery compared to the Reno6's 4300mAh. More importantly, the Pro’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is significantly faster than the Reno6’s 50W charging, allowing for a full charge in around 36 minutes versus roughly 45 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 is ideal for users prioritizing affordability and a smooth experience for everyday tasks. The Reno6 Pro 5G is best suited for gamers, power users, and those who want 5G connectivity and faster charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Reno6 Pro 5G worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance, 5G connectivity, and faster charging, then yes, the Reno6 Pro 5G is worth the investment. However, if you're on a budget and primarily use your phone for basic tasks, the Reno6 is still a capable device.
❓ What is the difference in camera quality between the two phones?
The Reno6 Pro 5G generally captures better photos, especially in low light, thanks to its larger 50MP main sensor and improved image processing. Both phones offer good image quality overall, but the Pro provides a noticeable upgrade.
