Oppo Reno6 vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Reno6 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 720G, while not the newest chip, is well-optimized, and the 50W charging is a significant advantage. However, users seeking a cleaner Android experience and potentially higher peak performance in specific tasks may find the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 27 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.3 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, PD2.0 | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora, Stellar Black | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | CPH2235 | - |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo Reno6
- 50W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Well-optimized Snapdragon 720G for smooth daily use
- Stylish and recognizable Oppo design
- Snapdragon 720G is an older chipset
- Software may include pre-installed apps (bloatware)
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- More powerful Dimensity 800U chipset for demanding tasks
- Near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware
- Potentially better gaming performance due to GPU
- Slower 30W charging compared to the Oppo Reno6
- MediaTek chipsets sometimes lack the same level of software optimization as Qualcomm
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs LCD) are missing, both likely utilize AMOLED technology common in this price bracket. The core difference lies under the hood. The Reno6’s Snapdragon 720G will need to drive the display, while the Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U has a more powerful GPU. This could translate to slightly smoother animations and potentially better gaming visuals on the Motorola, assuming both displays have similar refresh rates (which is not specified). Bezels are likely comparable, and without specific color accuracy data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a definitive comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality hinges on sensor size, aperture, and image processing. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone is a camera powerhouse. We can assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions. The Reno6’s image processing is likely tuned for vibrant, social media-friendly photos, while Motorola typically aims for a more natural look. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device would be a significant advantage, but this is not specified. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro lenses, the main sensor and its accompanying lens aperture will be the deciding factors.
Performance
The chipset battle is central here. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s MediaTek Dimensity 800U, fabricated on a 7nm process, theoretically offers a performance edge over the Oppo Reno6’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The Dimensity 800U’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, are more powerful than the Kryo 465 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 720G (2.3 GHz). However, Qualcomm’s optimization and software integration often close the gap. The Reno6 benefits from a mature software ecosystem, potentially leading to better sustained performance. The Edge 20 Fusion’s CPU advantage will be most noticeable in CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or complex calculations. Gaming performance will depend on the specific title and optimization, but the Dimensity 800U’s GPU should provide a slight advantage.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno6’s 50W wired charging with PD2.0 support is a clear advantage. This allows for significantly faster charging times compared to the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Reno6’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. A full charge from 0-100% on the Reno6 will likely take under 45 minutes, while the Edge 20 Fusion will likely require over an hour. This difference is crucial for users who frequently need to top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 if you need consistently smooth performance for everyday tasks, value incredibly fast charging speeds, and appreciate a stylish design. It’s ideal for social media users, casual gamers, and those who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prefer a near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware, prioritize raw CPU power for demanding applications, and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging speed. This phone suits power users and those who value software customization.