Oppo Reno6 Z vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China): A Deep Dive into Dimensity Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around usability and a more refined experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for power users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Z | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 20 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 14 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CPH2237 | - |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo Reno6 Z
- Sleek and lightweight design (assumed based on brand positioning)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- 30W charging offers decent charging speeds
- Dimensity 800U is outperformed by the Dimensity 1100
- Slower charging compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset for demanding tasks
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0 support
- 6nm process for improved efficiency
- Potentially larger and heavier form factor (assumed)
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies beneath the hood. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100, built on a 6nm process, inherently offers better power efficiency than the Reno6 Z’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). This translates to potentially longer screen-on time, even with similar battery capacities. The absence of specific display specs like refresh rate or peak brightness makes a direct comparison difficult, but the more efficient chipset gives the Redmi Note 10 Pro an indirect advantage in sustained usage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s processing power from the Dimensity 1100 likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Reno6 Z’s Dimensity 800U is capable, but the 1100 provides headroom for more complex computational photography features. It's reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 10 Pro benefits from faster image capture and processing speeds.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) boasts a significant performance advantage thanks to its Dimensity 1100. Its octa-core CPU configuration, featuring four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, outpaces the Reno6 Z’s Dimensity 800U with its two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. This architectural difference is crucial; the A78 cores offer a substantial IPC (Instructions Per Clock) improvement over the A76, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 6nm process further enhances efficiency, minimizing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 42 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Reno6 Z’s 30W charging, which will take considerably longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 1100’s 6nm efficiency partially offsets the power draw of faster processing, potentially resulting in comparable real-world battery life despite the faster charging speed. The inclusion of PD3.0 support on the Redmi Note 10 Pro also adds versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Z if you value a lighter, more manageable form factor and a balanced experience where design and everyday tasks take precedence. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and if minimizing charging time is a critical factor. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is the clear choice for those who push their phones to the limit.