Oppo Reno6 Z vs Reno8 T 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, 5G connectivity, and a more efficient chipset. While the Reno6 Z offers a solid experience, the Reno8 T 5G's upgrades make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Z | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 20 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 14 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | CPH2237 | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 340 EUR |
Oppo Reno6 Z
- Sleek and stylish design
- Good value for money
- Decent camera performance
- Slower charging
- No 5G connectivity
- Older chipset
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Fast 67W charging
- 5G connectivity
- More efficient and powerful chipset
- Likely slightly better camera
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno8 T 5G likely has a slightly brighter display, but both provide a pleasant viewing experience. Resolution is likely similar, around FHD+.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a triple-camera setup. The Reno8 T 5G likely has a slightly improved main sensor and potentially better image processing due to its newer chipset. Expect similar selfie camera performance. Low-light performance may be slightly better on the Reno8 T 5G.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Reno8 T 5G holds a significant advantage over the Dimensity 800U. The 6nm process offers better power efficiency and generally superior performance in everyday tasks and gaming. The Reno6 Z is still capable, but the Reno8 T 5G will feel snappier.
Battery Life
The Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times. The Reno6 Z's 30W charging is decent, but noticeably slower. Battery capacity is likely similar, around 4500-5000 mAh on both devices, but the Reno8 T 5G's efficiency gives it an edge.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno6 Z? It's a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize a sleek design and don't need 5G. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G? Ideal for those seeking faster charging, 5G capabilities, and a more modern chipset for smoother performance.