Oppo Reno6 Z vs Reno7 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster chipset, faster charging, and a brighter display. While the Reno6 Z offers a more affordable entry point, the Reno7 5G's upgrades make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Z | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 20 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 14 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | CPH2237 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Z
- More affordable
- Sleek design
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
- Older processor generation
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Faster 65W charging
- Brighter display
- Improved image processing
- Reverse wired charging
- More expensive
- Design may be less distinctive to some
Display Comparison
The Reno7 5G takes the display crown with a measured 635 nits max brightness, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight compared to the Reno6 Z. While the Reno6 Z's display is adequate, the Reno7 5G's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors, enhancing the viewing experience. Both likely use AMOLED panels, but the Reno7 5G's improvements are noticeable.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno7 5G likely has an edge due to its newer image processing capabilities and potentially improved sensors. While specific camera specs are not detailed, the Dimensity 900's ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more advanced than the one in the Dimensity 800U, leading to better image quality, especially in low light. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
The Reno7 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Reno6 Z's Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 900 offer significantly improved CPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The Reno6 Z is still capable, but the Reno7 5G provides a noticeably snappier experience.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Reno7 5G's 65W wired charging is a game-changer, fully charging the phone in just 31 minutes, compared to the Reno6 Z's 30W charging. The reverse wired charging on both is a nice bonus.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Z is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a sleek design and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno7 5G is perfect for those seeking a faster processor, quicker charging, and a better overall experience, especially if you value camera quality and display brightness.