Oppo Reno6 Z vs Reno6 Lite: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Lite edges out the Reno6 Z thanks to its faster Snapdragon 662 chipset and quicker 33W charging. While the Reno6 Z boasts a more powerful Dimensity 800U, the Lite's overall package provides a smoother, more efficient experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Z | Oppo Reno6 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 26, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 20 | 2022, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 14 | Available. Released 2022, January 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Black, Rainbow Silver |
| Models | CPH2237 | CPH2365 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 380 EUR |
Oppo Reno6 Z
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Sleek design
- Good front camera
- Slower charging
- Dimensity 800U can be less efficient than Snapdragon 662
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- Faster charging (33W)
- Efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Smooth everyday performance
- Slightly less powerful than Reno6 Z for demanding games
- Potentially less detailed photos in optimal lighting
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both, providing a sharp visual experience. There's little to differentiate them here, making it a draw.
Camera Comparison
The Reno6 Z typically features a 64MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The Reno6 Lite often has a 13MP front camera, while the Reno6 Z has a 16MP front camera. Image quality is generally good on both, but the Reno6 Z might offer slightly better detail in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance is comparable.
Performance
The Reno6 Z's Mediatek Dimensity 800U generally offers better raw performance, particularly in gaming. However, the Reno6 Lite's Snapdragon 662 is optimized for efficiency and provides a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks. Real-world performance differences may not be drastic for average users.
Battery Life
The Reno6 Lite has a clear advantage with its 33W fast charging, capable of reaching 54% in 30 minutes. The Reno6 Z's 30W charging is slower. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 4300-4500 mAh) on both, so the charging speed makes a significant difference in overall convenience.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Z is ideal for users prioritizing gaming and slightly more demanding tasks. The Reno6 Lite is a better choice for everyday users who value fast charging and a generally smoother user experience without breaking the bank.