Oppo Reno6 Z vs Reno6 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno6 5G takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and potentially better display. However, the Reno6 Z offers a more budget-friendly option with a still-capable processor and attractive design. It depends on your priorities!
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Z | Oppo Reno6 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 7, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 20 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 14 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Stellar Black, Aurora, Blue, Purple |
| Models | CPH2237 | PEQM00, CPH2251 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 146.99 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 362450 (v8), 430765 (v9) GeekBench: 2131 (v5.1) |
Oppo Reno6 Z
- Stylish Design
- Good Value for Money
- Decent Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Less Bright Display
Oppo Reno6 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Potentially Brighter Display
- Better Performance in Demanding Tasks
- Higher Price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Reno6 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 632 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the Reno6 Z's display is perfectly adequate, the Reno6 5G's 'infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests potentially richer colors and deeper blacks. Both likely feature AMOLED panels with a 90Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno6 5G likely has an edge in image processing and low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. While specific camera specs are not detailed, expect both to offer versatile shooting modes and good quality photos in well-lit conditions. Video recording capabilities are likely similar.
Performance
The Reno6 5G's Dimensity 900 chipset (6nm) is a noticeable upgrade over the Reno6 Z's Dimensity 800U (7nm). Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games on the Reno6 5G. The CPU architecture differences (Cortex-A78 vs A76) further contribute to this performance gap.
Battery Life
Both phones share an impressive endurance rating of 109 hours. However, the Reno6 5G's 65W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Reno6 Z's 30W charging. The reverse wired charging on the Reno6 Z is a minor bonus.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Z is ideal for users seeking a stylish and reliable phone for everyday tasks, social media, and casual photography, without breaking the bank. The Oppo Reno6 5G is a better choice for those who prioritize performance, faster charging, and a potentially brighter display, and are willing to spend a bit more.