OnePlus Nord 2 5G vs Oppo Reno6 Z: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset, coupled with 65W SuperVOOC charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage. While the Reno6 Z is a capable device, it can't match the Nord 2 5G's overall speed and efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Z | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 20 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 14 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | CPH2237 | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Z
- Sleek and stylish design
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Balanced overall experience
- Less powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Slower 30W charging
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Significantly faster Dimensity 1200 chipset
- 65W SuperVOOC charging (30 min full charge)
- Likely superior display brightness and color accuracy
- No reverse wireless charging
- Potentially less refined design (subjective)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 633 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno6 Z. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Nord 2 5G’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Contrast ratios are nominally infinite on both, typical of AMOLED technology. Bezels are comparable, but the Nord 2 5G’s display is likely to be more color accurate due to OnePlus’s historical focus on display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G likely benefits from MediaTek’s Imagiq 760 ISP, offering enhanced image processing. While both phones likely have a primary camera, the Nord 2 5G’s chipset allows for faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Reno6 Z’s camera system is likely tuned for a more saturated, social-media-friendly look, while OnePlus typically aims for more natural color reproduction. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the primary sensor is a critical factor, but not specified in the provided data.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno6 Z’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Dimensity 1200 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the Reno6 Z’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to significantly faster processing speeds and improved multitasking capabilities. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also offers better power efficiency, potentially mitigating thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the Nord 2 5G’s superior chipset will deliver a smoother and more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging speeds. However, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, capable of fully charging the device in just 30 minutes. The Oppo Reno6 Z’s 30W charging, while respectable, is significantly slower. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts convenience, allowing Nord 2 5G users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The Reno6 Z also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Nord 2 5G, allowing it to charge accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Z if you prioritize a sleek design and don't heavily rely on demanding applications or extended gaming sessions. Its 30W charging is adequate for everyday use. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you need a phone that can handle multitasking, gaming, and content creation without compromise. The faster processor and significantly faster charging are worth the slight price premium for power users.