The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno6 Z and Motorola Moto G100S represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Reno6 Z leverages MediaTek's Dimensity 800U, while the Moto G100S opts for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6s Gen 4. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more refined software experience, the Motorola Moto G100S emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a tangible advantage in sustained performance and thermal management, despite both phones sharing the same peak CPU clock speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 20 | 2025, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 14 | Available. Released 2025, November 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired
5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Black, Blue |
| Models | CPH2237 | - |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Oppo Reno6 Z
- Oppo's established camera software reputation
- Potential for a more vibrant display (depending on panel)
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Older 7nm Dimensity 800U chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- ColorOS may not appeal to all users
Motorola Moto G100S
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Superior sustained performance and thermal management
- Cleaner Android experience with fewer pre-installed apps
- Motorola's software update track record is less consistent
- Camera image processing may be less 'eye-catching' than Oppo
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Without specific display specs beyond the chipsets, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in the underlying processing power impacting display responsiveness. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4's improved GPU could translate to slightly smoother scrolling and animations. However, without knowing refresh rates or peak brightness, a definitive winner is difficult to declare. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the cost-conscious nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely employ similar sensor configurations targeting the mid-range market. The image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator. Oppo is known for its aggressive image enhancement, often resulting in vibrant, albeit sometimes artificial-looking, photos. Motorola typically aims for a more natural look. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced, potentially offering better noise reduction and dynamic range, but this is speculative without detailed sensor information. We can assume both will include a standard array of lenses, but the quality of the main sensor will be the deciding factor.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Motorola Moto G100S’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) holds a significant architectural advantage over the Oppo Reno6 Z’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). While both feature octa-core CPUs with a peak clock speed of 2.4GHz, the Snapdragon utilizes newer Cortex-A78 cores in its performance cluster, offering superior single-core performance. More importantly, the 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon results in better thermal efficiency, meaning the G100S is less likely to throttle under sustained load – crucial for gamers or those who frequently multitask. The Dimensity 800U is still capable, but the Snapdragon offers a clear edge in long-term performance.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 30W wired charging, offering comparable charging speeds – expect a full charge in approximately 60-75 minutes. Without knowing the battery capacity of the Reno6 Z, it’s difficult to assess battery life. However, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s superior efficiency could translate to slightly longer runtimes on the Moto G100S, even with a similar battery capacity. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Reno6 Z is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories, but not a major deciding factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Z if you prioritize a brand with a strong track record in camera software and are comfortable with ColorOS. It's a good option for casual users who primarily browse, stream, and occasionally snap photos. Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you value sustained performance for gaming or multitasking, appreciate a cleaner Android experience, and want a phone built on a more modern, efficient chipset architecture.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G100S struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 isn't a flagship chipset, its improved architecture and thermal efficiency compared to the Dimensity 800U allow for a more stable gaming experience. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings for optimal frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact, but the G100S should provide a smoother experience overall due to reduced throttling.
❓ How does Motorola's software support compare to Oppo's, and will the Moto G100S receive timely updates?
Historically, Motorola's software update track record hasn't been as consistent as Oppo's. Oppo generally provides faster and more frequent updates for its devices. While Motorola has improved in recent years, the Moto G100S may receive fewer major Android version updates and security patches compared to the Reno6 Z. This is a trade-off for the cleaner Android experience.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference between the two chipsets will be minimal. Both phones are capable of handling these tasks smoothly. However, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 will provide a more responsive experience when switching between multiple apps or performing more demanding tasks.
