Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, efficient experience and excellent value, the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G emerges as the winner. While the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a more powerful chipset and potentially superior camera hardware, its higher power consumption and potential for thermal throttling don't justify the price premium for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | PENM00 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- More efficient Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Excellent value for money
- Less powerful chipset than the Mi 11 Ultra
- Display specifications are less detailed
- Lacks wireless charging
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Brighter and potentially more refined display
- Faster and more versatile charging options
- Higher power consumption and potential for throttling
- May run hotter under sustained load
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 943 nits measured, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno6 Pro+. This makes the Mi 11 Ultra more usable in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Mi 11 Ultra’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a more refined panel. The Reno6 Pro+’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about its color accuracy and refresh rate capabilities unanswered. The Mi 11 Ultra’s larger display size also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera powerhouses, but the Mi 11 Ultra likely holds an edge. While both offer photo and video capabilities, the Mi 11 Ultra’s larger main sensor (specifications not provided in context) and advanced image processing algorithms likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Reno6 Pro+’s camera system is capable, but it’s unlikely to match the Mi 11 Ultra’s level of detail and dynamic range. The absence of details regarding the Reno6 Pro+'s sensor sizes and apertures makes a precise comparison difficult, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s focus on camera innovation is evident.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), while the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features the Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The 888, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, theoretically offers higher peak performance. However, the 5nm process of the 888 also means it generates more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling. The 870, built on a 7nm process, is known for its efficiency and sustained performance. The Mi 11 Ultra’s LPDDR5 RAM is standard for flagships, but the Reno6 Pro+’s RAM speed is not specified. In real-world usage, the Reno6 Pro+ is likely to provide a smoother, more consistent experience, while the Mi 11 Ultra may exhibit occasional performance dips during intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for either device). However, the Mi 11 Ultra offers significantly faster charging options: 67W wired (100% in 36 minutes), 67W wireless (100% in 39 minutes), and 10W reverse wireless. The Reno6 Pro+ supports 65W wired charging, which is still very fast, but lacks wireless charging capabilities. The Mi 11 Ultra’s charging versatility provides greater convenience for users who prefer wireless charging or need to quickly top up their battery on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G if you need a consistently smooth and responsive experience for daily tasks, gaming, and photography, without worrying about excessive heat or battery drain. It’s ideal for users who value efficiency and a balanced feature set. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you prioritize having the absolute best camera system possible, are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life, and frequently engage in demanding tasks like video editing or extended gaming sessions where peak performance is crucial.