Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs. vivo X70 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a more complete charging ecosystem, the vivo X70 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 888+ offers a noticeable performance edge, and the inclusion of 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging adds significant convenience. However, the Reno6 Pro+ remains a compelling option for those seeking a slightly more efficient experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | vivo X70 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | PENM00 | V2145A, V2114 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 720 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- Faster 65W wired charging
- Potentially more efficient Snapdragon 870
- Sleek design (based on brand aesthetic)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Limited charging versatility
vivo X70 Pro+
- More powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- 50W wireless charging and reverse charging
- Longer battery endurance (84h rating)
- Slower 55W wired charging compared to Reno6 Pro+
- Snapdragon 888+ can run hotter under sustained load
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, the provided data only highlights the vivo X70 Pro+'s 'Infinite' contrast ratio. This suggests a focus on deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno6 Pro+’s display specifications are absent, but given Oppo’s history, it likely features a comparable AMOLED panel with a high refresh rate. Without specific brightness (nits) or color accuracy data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X70 Pro+'s contrast ratio specification hints at a potentially superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices, making a precise comparison challenging. However, the X70 Pro+’s inclusion in vivo’s ‘Pro+’ line suggests a more advanced camera system. Historically, vivo’s Pro+ models prioritize camera innovation, often featuring larger sensors and advanced image processing. The absence of sensor size information for either phone necessitates relying on brand reputation; vivo typically excels in low-light photography and image stabilization. Without further details, it’s reasonable to assume the X70 Pro+ offers a more versatile and capable camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X70 Pro+ boasts the Snapdragon 888+ 5G, fabricated on a 5nm process, offering a significant architectural advantage over the Reno6 Pro+'s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 888+’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 3.0 GHz, provides a substantial boost in single-core performance compared to the Reno6 Pro+'s Kryo 585 prime core at 3.2 GHz. While the Reno6 Pro+’s higher clock speed might offer a slight edge in certain tasks, the 888+’s superior architecture and process node translate to better multi-core performance and thermal efficiency. This means the X70 Pro+ is less likely to throttle under sustained load, making it the better choice for prolonged gaming or video rendering. The X70 Pro+ also benefits from the improved Adreno 660 GPU.
Battery Life
The vivo X70 Pro+ has a clear advantage in charging versatility. Its 55W wired charging is respectable, but the addition of 50W wireless charging and both 5W reverse wireless and wired charging capabilities provide significant convenience. The Reno6 Pro+’s 65W wired charging is faster, but lacks wireless options. The X70 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting optimized power management. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the X70 Pro+'s charging ecosystem and endurance rating make it the more practical choice for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G if you need a phone that balances performance with efficiency, and prefer a streamlined software experience. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming but don’t necessarily demand the absolute highest frame rates. Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you prefer maximum performance for demanding tasks like video editing or graphically intensive games, and value the convenience of wireless and reverse wireless charging. This phone is geared towards power users and photography enthusiasts.