Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs Sony Xperia 1 III: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and consistent performance, the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 870 offers excellent efficiency, paired with blazing-fast 65W charging. While the Xperia 1 III boasts a more powerful chipset and a refined camera, its higher price and potential for thermal throttling make it a niche choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | PENM00 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio with Snapdragon 870
- Potentially better thermal management due to 7nm process
- Camera system likely less advanced than Xperia 1 III
- Display specs less detailed, potentially lacking features like high refresh rate
Sony Xperia 1 III
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Professional-grade camera system with advanced features
- High peak display brightness and excellent color accuracy
- Higher price point
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Slower 30W charging compared to Reno6 Pro+
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 III features a 6.5-inch display capable of reaching 620 nits of peak brightness, ensuring visibility even in bright sunlight. While the Reno6 Pro+’s display specs aren’t explicitly stated, Oppo typically employs AMOLED panels with excellent color accuracy. The Xperia 1 III’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED technology, provides deep blacks and vibrant colors. However, the Reno6 Pro+ may offer a higher refresh rate, a feature not mentioned for the Xperia 1 III, potentially leading to smoother scrolling and animations. The Xperia 1 III’s focus on color accuracy, geared towards content creators, is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed for their camera capabilities, but approach it differently. The Xperia 1 III’s camera system is geared towards professional photographers and videographers, offering extensive manual controls and features like 4K 120fps video recording. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Xperia 1 III’s emphasis on image processing and color science is a key selling point. The Reno6 Pro+ likely focuses on computational photography and AI enhancements for more accessible, point-and-shoot results. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno6 Pro+ suggests a focus on versatility rather than outright sensor size or lens quality. The Xperia 1 III’s variable telephoto lens is a significant advantage for zoom photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), while the Sony Xperia 1 III packs the Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The 5nm process of the Snapdragon 888 theoretically offers better power efficiency, but also generates more heat under sustained load. The Xperia 1 III’s CPU configuration, with a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, provides a performance edge in single-core tasks. However, the Snapdragon 870’s optimized architecture in the Reno6 Pro+ often delivers comparable real-world performance, especially in gaming, with less thermal throttling. Both phones feature octa-core CPUs, but the Xperia 1 III’s architecture is more focused on peak performance, while the Reno6 Pro+ prioritizes sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 82 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Reno6 Pro+). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G boasts 65W wired charging, capable of rapidly replenishing the battery. The Sony Xperia 1 III offers 30W wired charging with PD, reaching 50% in 30 minutes, alongside wireless and reverse wireless charging options. The Reno6 Pro+’s significantly faster charging speed provides a substantial convenience advantage, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G if you need a phone that delivers flagship-level performance without breaking the bank, and if fast charging is a priority. It’s ideal for gamers and power users who want a smooth experience without worrying about overheating. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you are a content creator who demands a professional-grade camera system with extensive manual controls, and if you value a unique, cinematic display experience, and are willing to pay a premium.