Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6 Pro emerges as the stronger overall choice. While the Reno6 Pro+ boasts significantly faster 65W charging, the Pixel 6 Pro’s superior display brightness, Google Tensor’s unique AI capabilities, and long-term software support provide a more compelling package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PENM00 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Strong Snapdragon 870 performance
- Likely shorter software support lifespan
- Slower charging than competitors in some areas
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Superior display brightness and contrast
- Google Tensor chip with AI-powered features
- Guaranteed software updates directly from Google
- Advanced camera processing and features
- Slower 23W wired and wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s display is a clear standout, achieving a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, significantly exceeding what’s likely available on the Reno6 Pro+ (data unavailable, but typically lower on non-LTPO panels). The Pixel 6 Pro’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), suggesting a true OLED experience with perfect blacks. While the Reno6 Pro+ likely offers excellent color accuracy, the Pixel 6 Pro’s higher brightness makes it far more usable in direct sunlight. The absence of LTPO on the Reno6 Pro+ also means it won't dynamically adjust refresh rates for power savings like the Pixel 6 Pro potentially can.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is heavily reliant on Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor chip. While specific sensor details are missing for the Reno6 Pro+, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Tensor chip enables features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode, which are unavailable on the Reno6 Pro+. The Reno6 Pro+ likely focuses on delivering natural-looking images, while the Pixel 6 Pro aims for a more processed, visually striking aesthetic. Ignoring the likely presence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on both devices, the core image quality difference will stem from software and processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ utilizes the Snapdragon 870 5G, a 7nm process node, known for its excellent balance of power and efficiency. The Google Pixel 6 Pro, however, features Google’s in-house Tensor chip, fabricated on a more advanced 5nm process. While the Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration (3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) provides strong multi-core performance, the Tensor’s custom cores (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) are optimized for machine learning tasks, impacting features like voice recognition and image processing. The 5nm process of the Tensor should also result in better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (data unavailable for Reno6 Pro+). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ supports 65W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in under 40 minutes. The Pixel 6 Pro, with its 23W wired charging (PD3.0, 50% in 30 min) and 23W wireless charging, is significantly slower. The Pixel 6 Pro also offers reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno6 Pro+. The Reno6 Pro+ prioritizes quick top-ups, while the Pixel 6 Pro offers more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G if you prioritize absolute charging speed and a slightly more compact form factor, and are comfortable with potentially less frequent software updates. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, cutting-edge camera features powered by AI, and guaranteed software support directly from Google, even if it means slower charging.