Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, efficient experience and excellent value, the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G emerges as the winner. While the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a more powerful chipset and potentially superior camera hardware, its higher power consumption and potential for thermal throttling don't justify the price premium for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | PENM00 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- Excellent thermal management with Snapdragon 870
- Competitive 65W wired charging
- Potentially better value for money
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially less powerful camera system
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Comprehensive charging options (wired, wireless, reverse)
- Likely superior camera hardware
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Higher power consumption
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 943 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno6 Pro+’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo typically utilizes high-quality AMOLED panels. The Mi 11 Ultra’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) is standard for AMOLED technology, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. However, without knowing the Reno6 Pro+'s display characteristics, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner; the Mi 11 Ultra’s brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as camera-centric, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s camera system is more ambitious. While both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, the Mi 11 Ultra’s sensor size and lens configuration are likely more advanced, though specific details are missing. The Mi 11 Ultra’s larger sensor will capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Reno6 Pro+ likely focuses on computational photography and software enhancements to compete, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s hardware advantage is significant. We can assume the Mi 11 Ultra has a more versatile camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), while the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features the Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The 888, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, theoretically offers higher peak performance. However, the 5nm process node of the 888 also means it generates more heat. The Snapdragon 870, built on a 7nm process, is known for its efficiency and sustained performance. The Mi 11 Ultra’s CPU architecture (Cortex-X1, A78, A55) is more advanced, but the Reno6 Pro+'s thermal management could lead to more consistent frame rates during extended gaming sessions. The Reno6 Pro+’s efficiency is a key advantage for everyday use.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Reno6 Pro+). However, the Mi 11 Ultra’s charging capabilities are more comprehensive: 67W wired (36 minutes to 100%), 67W wireless (39 minutes to 100%), 10W reverse wireless. The Reno6 Pro+ offers 65W wired charging, which is competitive, but lacks wireless charging options. The Mi 11 Ultra’s faster wireless charging and reverse wireless capabilities provide greater convenience and flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G if you need a consistently responsive phone for daily tasks, gaming, and photography without worrying about overheating or excessive battery drain. It’s ideal for users who value a balanced experience and don't necessarily need the absolute best specs on paper. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you prioritize camera versatility above all else, frequently shoot professional-quality photos and videos, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and occasional performance throttling during intensive tasks.