Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs Oppo Reno5 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Pro+ 5G is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering a substantial performance boost. While the Reno5 5G boasts excellent battery life and fast charging, the Reno6 Pro+’s superior processing power and likely improved camera make it the better overall choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | Oppo Reno5 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | PENM00 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.4 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Likely Improved Camera System
- Premium Build Quality
- Fast 65W Charging
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life (under heavy use)
- Higher Price
Oppo Reno5 5G
- Excellent Battery Life (109h Endurance Rating)
- Fast 65W Charging
- Reverse Wired Charging
- More Affordable
- Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 765G)
- Older Camera Technology
- Potentially Less Premium Design
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the Reno6 Pro+ 5G likely has a slightly higher resolution and potentially a more vibrant color profile. The Reno5 5G's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but it suggests good black levels. Brightness is a key factor; the Reno5 5G's measured 634 nits is a good starting point, but the Reno6 Pro+ likely surpasses this.
Camera Comparison
While both offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Reno6 Pro+ 5G likely features a more advanced camera system. Expect improvements in image quality, low-light performance, and video recording capabilities. The Reno6 Pro+ likely has a higher resolution primary sensor and potentially improved image processing algorithms.
Performance
This is where the Reno6 Pro+ 5G truly shines. The Snapdragon 870 is a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 765G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the Reno6 Pro+ 5G. The Reno5 5G is still capable, but it will struggle with more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Reno5 5G's endurance rating of 109h is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life. Both phones share the same 65W charging speed, allowing for quick top-ups. However, the Reno6 Pro+ 5G's more powerful chipset might slightly impact battery life under heavy use.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and a premium experience. It's a great choice for those who want a fast and responsive phone with a top-tier chipset. The Oppo Reno5 5G is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who value long battery life and fast charging, and are less concerned about raw processing power.