Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs Oppo Find X3 Neo: A Clash of Flagship Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Pro+ 5G edges out the Find X3 Neo thanks to its superior Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering a noticeable performance boost. While the Find X3 Neo boasts faster reverse wired charging, the Reno6 Pro+'s overall power and efficiency make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | Oppo Find X3 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black |
| Models | PENM00 | CPH2207 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 180 EUR |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- Superior Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Generally better camera performance
- Sleek design
- Future-proofed
- Potentially higher price
- No reverse wired charging
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- Fast 65W charging with reverse wired charging
- Excellent AMOLED display
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Slightly older Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Potentially less impressive camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals. The Find X3 Neo might have slightly better color accuracy due to its slightly newer panel technology, but the difference is minimal. Both offer excellent viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
The Reno6 Pro+ 5G typically features a more advanced camera system, often including a higher resolution primary sensor and improved image processing. While the Find X3 Neo's camera is still capable, the Reno6 Pro+ generally produces sharper, more detailed photos, especially in low light. The Reno6 Pro+ often includes enhanced video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Reno6 Pro+ 5G's Snapdragon 870 is a clear winner here. It offers a significant performance advantage over the Find X3 Neo's Snapdragon 865, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the Reno6 Pro+.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 65W fast charging, but the Find X3 Neo has a unique advantage with reverse wired charging, allowing you to charge other devices. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the Reno6 Pro+'s more efficient chipset may result in slightly better overall battery life.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G is ideal for users prioritizing performance, smooth gaming, and future-proofing. The Oppo Find X3 Neo is a great option for those seeking a slightly more affordable flagship with a focus on fast charging and a vibrant display, especially if they value reverse charging capabilities.