Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Performance and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 6 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Google Tensor chip, while not a raw performance leader, excels in computational photography and AI features. However, the Reno6 Pro+ 5G’s 65W charging remains a significant advantage for those who value speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PENM00 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G
- Incredibly fast 65W wired charging
- Stable and efficient Snapdragon 870 performance
- Competitive price point (especially now)
- Camera system lacks the advanced features of the Pixel 6 Pro
- Software support may be limited compared to Google
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality with advanced AI features
- Brighter and potentially more efficient display
- Long-term software support from Google
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Google Tensor chip may not match Snapdragon 870 in raw gaming performance
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno6 Pro+. This difference is noticeable in direct sunlight. Both displays offer an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While the Reno6 Pro+’s panel specifications aren’t available, the Pixel 6 Pro’s larger size and higher brightness make it better suited for media consumption. The Pixel 6 Pro’s display is also likely to benefit from LTPO technology, enabling variable refresh rates for improved efficiency, a feature not confirmed on the Reno6 Pro+.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details for the Reno6 Pro+ are missing, the Pixel 6 Pro’s computational photography prowess, driven by the Tensor chip, delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The Reno6 Pro+ likely relies more on hardware capabilities, but the Tensor chip’s AI algorithms give the Pixel 6 Pro a significant edge in post-processing. The absence of a dedicated telephoto lens on the Reno6 Pro+ also puts it at a disadvantage against the Pixel 6 Pro’s versatile camera setup.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), known for its stable performance and efficiency. The Google Pixel 6 Pro is powered by Google’s in-house Tensor chip (5nm). While the Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) delivers strong multi-core performance, the Tensor chip’s (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) focus is on AI and machine learning tasks. This translates to superior image processing and voice recognition on the Pixel 6 Pro. The 5nm process of the Tensor chip also offers better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads, though real-world testing is needed to confirm this.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G supports 65W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in under 30 minutes. The Google Pixel 6 Pro offers 23W wired charging (PD3.0, 50% in 30 min) and 23W wireless charging with reverse wireless capabilities. While the Pixel 6 Pro offers wireless charging convenience, the Reno6 Pro+’s significantly faster wired charging is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G if you need blazing-fast 65W charging and prioritize a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks and gaming, without demanding the absolute best in computational photography. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a superior camera system with advanced AI features, a brighter display, and a long-term software support commitment, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds.