Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: A Deep Dive into Android vs iOS Flagships

The Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G, released as a performance-focused Android contender, now faces a compelling comparison against the still-relevant Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max. While the iPhone 13 Pro Max represents Apple’s established ecosystem and premium build, the Reno6 Pro+ aimed to disrupt with its fast charging and capable Snapdragon 870 chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing long-term software support, a refined camera experience, and ecosystem integration, the iPhone 13 Pro Max remains the superior choice. However, the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G offers a compelling value proposition with its 65W charging and strong performance, making it ideal for Android enthusiasts seeking a fast and capable device.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66 - A2643, A2644, A2645
5G bands1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2643, A2644
SpeedHSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1x 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2641
Launch
Announced2021, May 272021, September 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, June 05Available. Released 2021, September 24
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass backGlass front, glass back, stainless steel frame
Dimensions160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in)160.8 x 78.1 x 7.7 mm (6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 in)
SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)240 g (8.47 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Ceramic Shield glass
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)1284 x 2778 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~458 ppi density)
Size6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak)Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)Hexa-core (2x3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 650Apple GPU (5-core graphics)
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12iOS 15, upgradable to iOS 26.1
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM, 1TB 6GB RAM
 UFS 3.1NVMe
Main Camera
FeaturesDual LED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama)
Quad50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)-
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6" SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
Triple-12 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.9µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.8, 77mm (telephoto), PDAF, 1/3.4", 1.0µm, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.8, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, stereo sound rec.
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanoramaHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jack-No
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGLightning, USB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrumFace ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 -Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Charging65W wiredWired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.2 update
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 4352 mAh (16.75 Wh)
Misc
ColorsArctic Blue, Lunar GreyGraphite, Gold, Silver, Sierra Blue, Alpine Green
ModelsPENM00A2643, A2484, A2641, A2644, A2645, iphone14,3
PriceAbout 520 EUR€ 423.38 / $ 394.86 / £ 355.00
SAR-1.18 W/kg (head)     1.20 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.99 W/kg (head)     0.98 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 121h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -24.0 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 801691 (v9) GeekBench: 4706 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G

  • Significantly faster 65W wired charging
  • Android OS offers greater customization
  • Potentially more affordable price point

  • Less refined software experience compared to iOS
  • Likely shorter software update support
  • Performance lags behind the A15 Bionic

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

  • Superior performance with the A15 Bionic chip
  • Exceptional camera system with advanced features
  • Long-term software support and ecosystem integration

  • Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo Reno6 Pro+
  • Less customization options with iOS
  • Higher price point

Display Comparison

The iPhone 13 Pro Max boasts a display capable of reaching 1050 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno6 Pro+ 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, Oppo typically utilizes AMOLED panels with vibrant colors. The iPhone’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, inherent to OLED technology, delivers deeper blacks and a more dynamic image compared to what the Reno6 Pro+ likely offers. The iPhone’s ProMotion technology (variable refresh rate) is absent on the Reno6 Pro+, potentially resulting in less smooth scrolling and animations.

Camera Comparison

Both devices excel in camera performance, but approach it differently. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is renowned for its computational photography and cinematic mode for video recording. While specific sensor details for the Reno6 Pro+ 5G are missing, Oppo historically focuses on delivering vibrant, social media-ready images. The iPhone’s sensor-shift stabilization and advanced image processing algorithms provide superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The Reno6 Pro+ likely relies more on software enhancements to achieve similar results. The iPhone’s video capabilities, particularly ProRes recording, are a significant advantage for professional content creators.

Performance

Apple’s A15 Bionic, fabricated on a 5nm process, demonstrably outperforms the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7nm) in both CPU and GPU benchmarks. The A15’s hexa-core architecture, with its 2x3.23 GHz Avalanche and 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard cores, is optimized for sustained performance. While the Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration (3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 1.80 GHz Kryo 585) is capable, it lacks the architectural efficiency of the A15. This translates to the iPhone 13 Pro Max handling demanding tasks like video editing and graphically intensive games with greater ease and potentially less thermal throttling. The iPhone also benefits from Apple’s tight software-hardware integration.

Battery Life

Both the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G and the iPhone 13 Pro Max achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating comparable overall battery life. However, the charging experience differs dramatically. The Reno6 Pro+ 5G’s 65W wired charging is significantly faster, capable of fully charging the device in under 40 minutes. The iPhone 13 Pro Max, with its 2.0 PD charging, takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 50% and longer for a full charge. The iPhone also supports 15W wireless charging via MagSafe and Qi2 (with iOS 17.2), while the Reno6 Pro+’s wireless charging capabilities are not specified.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G if you need blazing-fast 65W charging, prefer the flexibility of Android, and prioritize raw performance-per-dollar. Buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max if you prefer a seamless user experience, a consistently excellent camera system, and long-term software updates within the Apple ecosystem.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 870 in the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 870 is a capable chip, it may require reduced graphics settings in extremely demanding games like Genshin Impact to maintain consistent frame rates. The A15 Bionic in the iPhone 13 Pro Max will handle these games with ease at maximum settings.
❓ How does the iPhone 13 Pro Max's camera perform in low-light conditions compared to the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G?
The iPhone 13 Pro Max consistently delivers superior low-light performance due to its larger sensor, sensor-shift stabilization, and advanced image processing algorithms. The Reno6 Pro+ 5G will likely rely more on software enhancements, which may result in less natural-looking images in challenging lighting conditions.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between the two phones truly noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The 65W charging on the Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G allows you to top up the battery from 0% to 100% in under 40 minutes, while the iPhone 13 Pro Max takes considerably longer. This difference is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly recharge their devices.