Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera capabilities and long-term software support, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the superior choice. While the Reno6 Pro boasts incredibly fast 65W charging, the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip and advanced image processing deliver a more compelling overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 05 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 73.1 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 - International UFS 3.1 - China | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Aurora, Majestic Gold, Diwali Edition | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PEPM00, CPH2249 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 120 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| SAR | 1.17 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G
- Incredibly fast 65W wired charging
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Competitive price point
- Less advanced camera system
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Chipset lacks dedicated AI processing
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera performance with AI enhancements
- Guaranteed software updates from Google
- Powerful Google Tensor chip for AI tasks
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Larger and heavier design
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, significantly enhancing outdoor visibility compared to what we’d expect from the Reno6 Pro (data unavailable, but typically lower in this price bracket). While both offer excellent contrast ratios (the Pixel 6 Pro claims 'infinite'), the Pixel’s larger 6.71-inch panel and potentially higher resolution (assumed, based on market positioning) provide a more immersive viewing experience. The Pixel 6 Pro’s display technology likely incorporates LTPO for variable refresh rates, contributing to improved battery efficiency, a feature not confirmed on the Reno6 Pro.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor chip, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range, detail preservation, and low-light performance. The Reno6 Pro likely offers a competent camera experience, but it won’t match the Pixel’s AI-driven capabilities. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno6 Pro suggests a focus on general-purpose photography rather than specialized features. The Pixel 6 Pro’s advanced algorithms provide features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode, unavailable on the Reno6 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Tensor (5nm) utilizes a 2+2+4 core configuration with Cortex-X1 performance cores, designed for machine learning tasks. This contrasts with the Reno6 Pro’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm) which employs a 1+3+4 configuration with Cortex-A78 performance cores. While the Dimensity 1200 offers strong raw CPU performance, the Tensor chip excels in AI-driven features like real-time translation and advanced image processing. The Tensor’s 5nm process also provides a theoretical thermal advantage, potentially leading to more sustained performance under heavy load. Both phones utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s software optimization likely maximizes its efficiency.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (data unavailable for Reno6 Pro). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Reno6 Pro’s 65W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in under 40 minutes. The Pixel 6 Pro compensates with 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Reno6 Pro. The Pixel 6 Pro’s charging reaches 50% in 30 minutes, while the Reno6 Pro would achieve a full charge in that timeframe.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G if you need blazing-fast charging speeds and a streamlined user experience without the complexities of a heavily customized Android skin. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value a sleek, lightweight design. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a best-in-class camera system, guaranteed software updates directly from Google, and a unique, AI-powered smartphone experience. It’s the better option for photography enthusiasts and those invested in the Google ecosystem.