Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) vs Xiaomi 11T Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 11T Pro takes the lead with its significantly faster 120W charging and slightly more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset. However, the Reno6 Pro 5G offers excellent value and a refined design. Ultimately, the 11T Pro is for power users, while the Reno6 Pro is a great all-rounder.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 09 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | CPH2247 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
- Excellent portrait mode
- Stylish design
- Good battery life (108h endurance)
- 65W fast charging
- Natural color reproduction
- Slightly less powerful chipset than 11T Pro
- Lower peak brightness than 11T Pro
- Charging speed slower than 11T Pro
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (17 min to 100%)
- Higher peak brightness (837 nits)
- Good performance in bright light
- Wider ultrawide lens
- Design less premium than Reno6 Pro
- Battery endurance slightly lower
- Can get warm under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate. The Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 837 nits compared to the Reno6 Pro's 780 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility. Both have infinite contrast ratios, providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. The difference in brightness is noticeable but not drastic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems. The Reno6 Pro 5G is known for its excellent portrait mode and natural-looking color reproduction. The Xiaomi 11T Pro excels in bright light conditions and offers more detail in its photos. Video recording capabilities are comparable, with both phones supporting 4K recording at 60fps. The 11T Pro's ultrawide lens is slightly wider, offering a broader field of view.
Performance
The Xiaomi 11T Pro's Snapdragon 888 offers a noticeable performance edge over the Reno6 Pro's Snapdragon 870. While both are capable of handling demanding games and multitasking, the 888 provides smoother performance and better sustained speeds, especially under heavy load. The 11T Pro's cooling system also appears to be more effective.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 108h endurance rating compared to the Xiaomi 11T Pro's 92h. However, the Xiaomi 11T Pro's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 17 minutes – a significant advantage over the Reno6 Pro's 65W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)? Users prioritizing a balanced experience with a stylish design, good camera performance, and reliable battery life. Who should buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro? Those who demand the fastest charging speeds, top-tier performance, and don't mind a slightly less premium feel.