Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G vs Reno8 T 5G: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Pro 5G boasts significantly superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset. However, the Reno8 T 5G offers faster charging and a potentially more modern design. Ultimately, the Reno6 Pro 5G is for performance seekers, while the Reno8 T 5G is a great value option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 09 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | CPH2247 | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Excellent Battery Life (108h Endurance)
- Potentially Better Camera (due to processor)
- Premium Build Quality (assumed)
- 60Hz Display (potentially outdated)
- Slower Charging (65W)
- Potentially Higher Price
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Modern Design (assumed)
- Good Value for Money
- Likely Higher Refresh Rate Display (90Hz/120Hz)
- Lower Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
- Less Versatile Camera (potentially)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the Reno6 Pro 5G's 780 nits peak brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. The Reno8 T 5G likely has a more modern refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz, assumed) compared to the Reno6 Pro 5G's standard 60Hz, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. Contrast ratio is likely excellent on both, given the AMOLED technology.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The Reno6 Pro 5G likely has a more versatile setup with potentially better low-light performance due to the more powerful processor assisting image processing. The Reno8 T 5G's camera likely benefits from newer image processing algorithms. Detailed camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
This is where the Reno6 Pro 5G truly shines. The Snapdragon 870 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 695. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far better gaming experience on the Reno6 Pro 5G. The Reno8 T 5G is still capable for everyday tasks, but it will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Reno6 Pro 5G boasts an incredible endurance rating of 108 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Reno8 T 5G, while likely having a slightly smaller battery, compensates with 67W fast charging, achieving a 100% charge in just 44 minutes. This offers a trade-off between longevity and charging speed.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)? Users prioritizing raw power, smooth gaming, and overall flagship-level performance. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G? Budget-conscious buyers seeking a stylish phone with fast charging and a capable camera, willing to compromise slightly on performance.