Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G vs Reno7 Z 5G: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) offers significantly superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset and boasts incredible battery life. However, the Reno7 Z 5G provides a more modern design and faster charging, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious users prioritizing aesthetics and quick top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Reno7 Z 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2022, March 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 09 | Available. Released 2022, March 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| - | IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey | Black, Rainbow |
| Models | CPH2247 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
- Exceptional Battery Life (108h Endurance)
- Flagship Snapdragon 870 Performance
- High Peak Brightness Display (780 nits)
- Fast 65W Charging
- Premium Build Quality (likely)
- Potentially Older Design
- May lack some of the latest camera features
- Potentially higher price
Oppo Reno7 Z 5G
- Sleek and Modern Design
- Faster 33W Charging
- More Affordable Price
- 5G Connectivity
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Mid-Range Snapdragon 695 Performance
- Significantly Shorter Battery Life
- Lower Peak Brightness Display
- Potentially less refined camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, but the Reno6 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 780 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno7 Z 5G's contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' (likely a nominal value), both displays should provide vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno6 Pro 5G may have a slightly smoother display due to potentially higher refresh rate (likely 90Hz, based on general Reno6 Pro specs).
Camera Comparison
Camera capabilities are comparable, but the Reno6 Pro 5G likely has a slight edge in image quality due to its more powerful processor and potentially better image processing algorithms. Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but the Reno6 Pro 5G's superior processing should result in more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Video recording quality should be good on both, but the Reno6 Pro 5G might offer slightly better stabilization.
Performance
The Reno6 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 870 is a significant performance leap over the Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the Reno6 Pro 5G. The 870 is a flagship-level chipset, while the 695 is a mid-range option.
Battery Life
The Reno6 Pro 5G absolutely dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 108 hours – an exceptional figure. The Reno7 Z 5G offers decent battery life, but it falls far short of the Reno6 Pro 5G's longevity. The Reno7 Z 5G does compensate with significantly faster 33W charging, reaching 100% in approximately 63 minutes, compared to the Reno6 Pro 5G's 65W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is ideal for power users, gamers, and those who demand top-tier performance and exceptional battery life. The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G is a great choice for users who prioritize a sleek design, faster charging, and a more affordable price point, while still enjoying 5G connectivity.